Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
409 lines (282 loc) · 27.7 KB

README.md

File metadata and controls

409 lines (282 loc) · 27.7 KB

LIFE CENTERED AI: COOPERATIVE AI and REGENERATIVE ECONOMICS

CONTENTS:


MISSION:

To build a simulation/game about the future of our planet and AI, bringing together nature, humans, and AI, to create a global simulation/game with Life Centered AI. In our divided world we are unable to address the global challenge of our collective future. Through play we can create a new way for people to relate to science and nature, to give nature and people a voice in the future of our planet and AI, and put tools of prediction in everyone's hands, so we can design a better future for our planet and AI together.

Game Objective: A Bill of Rights For A More Than Human World in the AI Era Players from around the world collaborate to draft a comprehensive Bill of Rights for Nature and People in the context of advanced AI technologies. The game will simulate real-world scenarios and challenges, requiring players to negotiate, debate, and reach consensus on things like the rights of non human organisms and ecosystems, & human rights in the AI era, environmental sustainability, AI governance, ethical use of AI, access to technology, AI and employment, AI and art, and transhuman rights.

Target Audience: The game will be accessible to a wide range of participants – people living far from or near to nature, farmers, scientists, policymakers, legal experts, technologists, students, and activists. Diversity in participants will enrich the perspectives and solutions proposed.

Scenario-Based Gameplay: Players face various scenarios, in partnership with AI agents, that impact humans and non human organisms and ecosystems. These scenarios can range from environmental challenges, ethical dilemmas in AI usage, to socio-economic impacts of AI on different communities. Players must navigate these scenarios while drafting the Bill of Rights.

Scenario Development: Diverse simulation environments created with multi-agent simulation frameworks like Melting Pot and Net Logo can mirror real-world ecosystems, societal structures, and technological and non human contexts. These scenarios will include elements where AI, nature, and human interests intersect and sometimes conflict, requiring cooperation and negotiation to resolve.

Role Assignment: Participants (AI agents and human players) assume various roles representing different stakeholders, including non humans and ecosystems, policymakers, activists, scientists and ordinary people, to communicate, negotiate, and reimagine the rights of humans and non human organisms & ecosystems, and new institutions of governance to empower such rights. AI agents can be programmed with varying degrees of cooperation and competitiveness to simulate different societal attitudes and alternative perspectives towards nature and technology.

Game Theory Applications: Game theory will be utilized to design scenarios where participants face dilemmas that mirror real-world challenges ( e.g. tragedy of the commons, public goods game). These dilemmas require participants to negotiate, form alliances, and make decisions that can either lead to mutual benefit or collective loss, emphasizing the importance of cooperative strategies.

Complex Systems Modeling: Can simulate the dynamic interactions between different agents and their environment, allowing for emergent behaviors and outcomes. This approach can help identify stable strategies for cooperation and highlight the systemic impacts of individual actions on nature and society.

Feedback Mechanisms: Incorporating AI-driven simulation models can predict the outcomes of certain policies or decisions. Additionally, feedback from natural ecosystems (through data on environmental impacts) and public data sets and opinion surveys can be integrated to guide decision-making in the game. Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback (RLHF) will be reimagined to include feedback from non human organisms and ecosystems.

A Real World Bill of Rights: The ultimate goal will be to create a refined, well-thought-out Bill of Rights for Nature and People in the AI Era that could be presented to real-world organizations and governments for consideration. The game will not only serve as a platform for drafting a vital document but also act as a global educational tool and a means to foster understanding and consensus in our divided world.

COOPERATIVE AI:

Cooperative AI is key to improving human and AI cooperation capabilities and creating an impactful bill of rights.

Cooperative AI differs from current approaches to AI development where cooperation is a super structure built on a single agent system. Instead, Cooperative AI proposes a multi-agent systems approach, drawing on game theory, complex systems design, environmental science, law, ethics, policy work, education, learning, and inclusivity to advance both AI cooperation and human cooperation.

Important tools include NetLogo - a multi-agent programmable modeling environment, and DeepMind's Melting Pot - a multi-agent simulation framework designed to test the cooperative and competitive abilities of AI agents in complex, dynamic environments. Melting Pot is a rich platform for simulating interactions in diverse scenarios, enabling better understanding and improvement of the collaborative and cooperative capabilities of AI, non human organisms/ecosystems, and people. Melting Pot would be a powerful framework to build on to create a global simulation/game aimed at cooperatively crafting a Bill of Rights For A More THan Human World in the AI era, but integration would involve some innovative steps.

REGENERATIVE ECONOMICS

Regenerative Economics formalize a definition of value which is not predicated upon harvest, but a living world that has value in being alive, and keeping us alive, ie. make the more than human world legible to economics, and rights discourse.

Protocols for the stewardship of common resources and public goods in a more-than-human world and the possibility of non-humans to own things.

Decentralized protocols for non-human identities. An ecosystem may be a trust or a fund.

The design of new ecological institutions that include non human organisms must center on the perspectives and insights of communities that are part of the ecosystem.

ADVANCING COOPERATIVE AI AND HUMAN COOPERATION

Life Centered AI: Cooperative AI’s synergies with regenerative economics, social sciences, policy, evolutionary biology, and AI simulations using game theory, and complex system design can advance cooperative AI, human cooperation, human and non human cooperation, AI safety and alignment, and define a new paradigm - Life Centered AI.

AI as Negotiation Agents: Develop AI agents capable of negotiating with both humans and other AI agents to reach consensual decisions. These agents can use advanced algorithms to propose solutions that maximize collective welfare, learning from interactions to improve their proposals over time.

Human-AI Collaboration: Encourage real-time collaboration between human participants and AI agents, leveraging AI to facilitate discussions, generate creative solutions, and model the outcomes of proposed actions. This collaboration can enhance human decision-making with insights drawn from AI analysis and simulation results.

Collaborative Tools: The game will provide tools within the game for drafting documents, voting, holding discussions, and forming coalitions or groups. This will simulate real-world legislative and policy-making processes and reimagine them.

Education and Learning: The game will have an educational aspect, teaching players about AI technologies, environmental science, legal principles, and ethical considerations. This will make the game more accessible to those without a background in these areas.

Public Engagement and Transparency: Outcomes of the game sessions and the evolving draft of the Bill of Rights will be published regularly to encourage public engagement and transparency.

Crafting the Bill of Rights with Interactive Decision-Making: Through the game, participants work together to address specific issues, draft clauses, and revise proposals for the Bill of Rights. This process is iterative, with multiple rounds of discussion, simulation, and revision based on the outcomes of previous decisions.

Consensus Building: Utilize the framework to identify policies and rights that receive broad support from both AI and human participants, focusing on solutions that balance technological advancement with the protection of nature and human rights.

GLOBAL REPRESENTATION

*"to honor, learn, and document practices of natural resource management from lineages of folk and traditional ecological knowledge to understand how a new era of ecological institutions can nurture and legitimize non-Western, non-dualist conceptions of human-environmental relation." Austin Wade Smith

  • Diverse Ecosystems and Cultures:
    With accurate geospatial data from around the world, the game can represent a wide range of ecosystems and cultures, allowing players to learn about and engage with different parts of the globe.

  • Localized Challenges: Introduce challenges that are specific to certain geographic regions, encouraging players to understand and address local as well as global environmental and AI-related issues.

Data-Driven Decision Making

  • Environmental Impact Analysis:
    Players can use the geospatial data to analyze and predict the environmental impact of their decisions, making the gameplay more strategic and data-driven.

  • Urban Planning and Development Scenarios: Incorporate urban planning and development scenarios where players must balance development needs with environmental conservation, using real-world data to guide their decisions.

REPRESENTING NATURE IN A SIMULATION

Dynamic Ecosystem Simulations: Including forests, oceans, urban environments, and agricultural lands. Changes in these ecosystems, based on player decisions, provide direct feedback on the environmental impact of those decisions.

Real-Time Environmental Data Integration: Deploying The IUCN Global Ecosystem Functional Typology a hierarchical classification system that, in its upper levels, defines ecosystems by their convergent ecological functions and, in its lower levels, distinguishes ecosystems with contrasting assemblages of species engaged in those functions.

Public Databases that support and/or are compatible with the IUCN's typology for ecosystems include:

  • Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF)
  • Protected Planet (World Database on Protected Areas - WDPA)
  • World Database on Ecosystems (WDE)
  • Ocean Biodiversity Information System (OBIS)
  • Global Forest Watch (GFW)
  • eBird
  • The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species
  • IPBES (Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services) Global Assessments
  • Land Cover databases (e.g., Copernicus Land Monitoring Service, MODIS Land Cover)
  • RAMSAR Sites Information Service

Virtual Representation of Species and Habitats: A diverse range of species and habitats will be introduced within the game. Each species and habitat will have its own set of characteristics, requirements for survival, and responses to environmental changes.

Nature as a Stakeholder:

  • Nature not just as a backdrop, but as an active stakeholder in the game.
  • AI agents provide 'Voices' for various aspects of nature and other species, that can act as representatives, and can speak on a council for the forests or oceans, and create dialogue between species. providing feedback, and making requests of the players.

Environmental Challenges and Disasters: Challenges like natural disasters, introduced into the game/simulation, can be both a result of player actions (such as climate change leading to more severe weather events) and random occurrences. This adds an element of unpredictability and urgency to address environmental issues.

Sustainability Metrics: Sustainability metrics are introduced in the game, such as carbon footprints, biodiversity indexes, or pollution levels, which players must manage and improve.

Interactive Learning Modules: Modules that educate players on ecological concepts, environmental stewardship, and the impact of human activities on nature. These modules are a mix of mini-games, documentaries, and interactive lessons.

Collaboration with Nature: Scenarios where players need to work alongside nature, like restoring a damaged ecosystem, which can teach the principles of ecological restoration and conservation.

Storytelling and Narratives: Storytelling to convey the history, struggles, and beauty of the natural world, to create emotional connections and a deeper understanding of environmental issues.

REFLECTING THE PERSPECTIVE OF NATURE IN REINFORCEMENT LEARNING

Incorporate Environmental Data: Integrate real-time environmental data into the Reinforcement Learning algorithm. This could include data on climate change, biodiversity, pollution levels, and other ecological indicators. By basing game scenarios on actual environmental conditions, the Reinforcement Learning system can reflect the state and needs of nature more accurately.

Ecological Models: Use established ecological models within the RL framework to simulate the impact of various actions on the environment. These models can help predict long-term consequences of decisions made in the game.

Expert Input: Collaborate with environmental scientists and ecologists to guide the development of the RL algorithms. Their expertise can ensure that the AI accurately models natural processes and ecological interactions.

Nature-Centric Objectives: Design game objectives and rewards that prioritize ecological balance and sustainability. This encourages players to make decisions that are beneficial for the environment.

Dynamic Feedback Loops: Create dynamic feedback loops where the state of the environment in the game influences the challenges and scenarios players face. This makes the health of the environment a direct factor in gameplay success.

ECONOMY

Currency players (human and non human organisms and ecosystems) earn through participation, decision-making, educational activities, and other contributions within the game.

Earned Through Achievements: Currency can be earned by achieving certain milestones, such as:

  • successfully drafting a section of the Bill of Rights,
  • completing educational modules,
  • effectively collaborating with other players.

Performance and Impact-Based Earnings: The amount of currency earned can be tied to the impact of a player's decisions on environmental sustainability, ethical AI use, and human rights protection.

Spending and Investment

  • Educational Resources Access:

    • Players can use the currency to unlock advanced educational materials, expert lectures, or specialized workshops within the game.
  • Gameplay Advancements:

    • Currency might be used to access advanced levels, unique scenarios, or special challenges in the game.
  • Community Contributions:

    • Allow players to use the currency to support community initiatives within the game, such as:
      • funding virtual environmental projects
      • AI ethics research.
  • Peer-to-Peer Exchange for fostering a collaborative environment:

    • Implement a system where players can exchange currency for:
      • advice,
      • insights,
      • assistance from other players

Reward for Real-World Impact

  • Linking to Real-World Actions:

    • Offer rewards for players who take actions outside the game that align with the game's goals, like:
      • participating in environmental conservation activities
      • attending AI ethics seminars
  • Recognition and Status:

    • Use the currency to also build a system of recognition, where, based on their contributions and achievements, players can gain:
      • titles,
      • badges,
      • rankings

Sustainability of the Economy

  • Balanced Inflow and Outflow:

    • The generation and expenditure of currency are balanced, so the economy remains stable and engaging for players at all levels.
  • Feedback-Driven Adjustments:

    • Continuously monitor and adjust the economy based on player feedback and participation trends to keep it relevant and motivating.
  • Incorporate Real-world Economic Concepts:

    • Introduce elements to educate players about economic principles like:
      • inflation,
      • investment,
      • resource allocation.

Ethical Considerations

  • Prevent Monetization and Exploitation:

    • Design for abundance and collaboration rather than profit.
  • Accessibility:

    • Ensure that the economy does not disadvantage players who have less time to invest in the game, maintaining fairness and inclusivity.
  • Incentivize participation, education, and collaboration, aligning players' in-game activities with the overarching goal of developing a comprehensive and meaningful Bill of Rights for A More Than Human World in the AI era.

ENRICHING PEOPLE:

Educational Feedback: Provide informative feedback to players about outcomes of their actions. This will include explanations of how certain policies or decisions impact AI ethics, human rights, or environmental health.

Real-World Correlations: Make connections between game scenarios and real-world events to enable understanding of the complexity of these issues in real life and the importance of virtual decisions.

Interactive Learning Modules: Incorporate interactive modules or mini-games that focus on specific topics like AI ethics, environmental science, or policy-making. This can provide deeper insights and learning opportunities.

Community Discussion Forums: Facilitate forums or discussion groups within the game where players can debate and discuss their decisions and strategies. This peer-to-peer interaction can be a rich source of learning.

Reflective Journals or Logs: Encourage players to keep journals or logs of their decisions and reflections. This process can help deepen their understanding and awareness of the issues tackled in the game.

Expert Insights: Regularly integrate insights from experts in AI, environmental science, law, and ethics. These insights could be in the form of in-game seminars, webinars, or articles.

Personalized Learning Paths: Based on player decisions and performance, offer personalized learning paths or resources to help them understand the areas where they need more knowledge or improvement.

Reward System for Learning: Implement a reward system that encourages not just game progression but also learning and understanding of the issues at hand.

CREATING AN IMMERSIVE INTERACTIVE EXPERIENCE

  • Dynamic Environment Creation:

    • ControlNet can be used to generate diverse and changing environments within the game. This tool, which assists in controlling the generation of images and scenes, can help in creating realistic and dynamic simulations of natural landscapes and urban environments that respond to player actions.
  • Custom Scenario Visualization:

    • To aid in visualizing unique scenarios based on text inputs, allowing the game to present tailored visual feedback on the environmental impact of players' decisions.

MVDream

  • 3D Rendering: MVDream, known for creating impressive 3D renderings from text, to generate detailed and realistic 3D models of various elements within the game, such as animals, plants, and ecological systems.

  • Realism and Detail is the language of nature: The ability to create high-quality 3D assets will enhance the realism of the game, making the experience more engaging and informative for the players.

Language Embedded NeRFs

  • Immersive Environments:

    • By using Neural Radiance Fields, the game can create highly immersive and lifelike 3D environments. This technology is capable of rendering complex light and material interactions, providing a more realistic experience.
  • Interactive Elements:

    • NeRFs will be used to create interactive elements within the game that respond in real-time to changes in the environment or actions by the players, adding a layer of depth and interactivity to the game experience.

Avatar Creation

  • Ready Player Me capabilities for players to create their own custom avatars.

  • Social Interaction:

    • With personalized avatars, the game can facilitate more meaningful social interactions among players, essential for collaborative decision-making processes in the game.

Integration for a Cohesive Experience

  • Combining Technologies:

    • Integrating these technologies will require considerable effort to ensure that they work together seamlessly, providing an effortless, fluid, and consistent experience.
  • Balancing Complexity and Accessibility:

    • While these technologies can significantly enhance the game's realism and interactivity, it's important to balance complexity with accessibility, ensuring that the game remains user-friendly for a diverse audience.

EDUCATIONAL AND ENGAGEMENT CONCEPTS

  • Educational Content:

    • Leveraging these technologies, for educational content delivery within the game, can greatly enhance the learning experience:
      • interactive lessons on environmental science
      • AI ethics
  • Engagement and Motivation:

    • The high level of realism and interactivity provided by these technologies can increase player engagement and motivation, making the learning process more enjoyable and effective.

REAL WORLD GEOSPATIAL MAPPING

Accurate Terrain Representation: e.g. Open GeoWeb.netowrk or BlackShark.ai's technology, which can convert satellite imagery into 3D maps, can be used to accurately recreate real-world terrains and landscapes in the game. This would provide players with a more realistic and relatable environment.

Dynamic Environmental Simulation: The multidimensional data can be used to simulate environmental changes over time, reflecting the impact of player decisions and natural processes on the game's world.

Integration with Unreal Engine or open game engine.

Interactive and Responsive Environments: The combination allows for the creation of environments that are not only visually realistic but also interactive. Players can see the direct impact of their actions on the virtual world in real-time.

Enhancing Gameplay with Realism Scenario-Based Challenges: Use real-world geographic data to create specific environmental challenges. For example, players might need to address rising sea levels in a coastal city or manage the impact of urban sprawl on natural habitats.

Educational Opportunities: Real-world geography can be used for educational modules within the game, teaching players about geography, ecology, and environmental science.

ACCESSIBILITY AND SCALABILITY

  • Scalable Complexity: While offering detailed and realistic environments, the game will balance complexity with accessibility, ensuring that players with different levels of expertise can engage and learn.

  • Cloud-Based Data Handling: Leverage cloud computing to handle the extensive data processing requirements, ensuring smooth gameplay even with detailed geospatial data.

By incorporating multidimensional geospatial data from sources e.g BlackShark.ai, the simulation game can provide an exceptionally realistic, immersive platform, enabling players to deeply understand and engage with the challenges of creating a Bill of Rights for Nature and Humans in the Era of emerging Generative AI.

SYSTEM DEPENDENCY MAP

A system dependency map visualizing the relationships and dependencies between various components of the simulation game. Key components might include:

  • AI Technologies (ControlNet, MVDream, Language Embedded NeRFs, ReadyPlayerMe):

  • Dependency on user input and environmental data for generating scenarios.

  • Interaction with the Unreal Engine, Bevy, etc for rendering and visualizing content.

    • Central platform for rendering game visuals.
    • Dependent on AI technologies for content creation and geospatial data for environment generation.
  • Geospatial Data (e.g. BlackShark.ai).

  • Integration with environmental models to simulate real-world scenarios.

    • Receive data from geospatial platform e.g. BlackShark.ai and player inputs to simulate environmental changes.
    • Influence game scenarios and player challenges based on environmental state.
  • Dependency on cloud computing resources for data processing.

Player Interface:

  • Receives input from players.
  • Displays game output, including visualizations and feedback.

Cloud Computing Resources:

  • Support for data processing and storage.
  • Hosting the game servers for multiplayer interaction/containers for persistent cloud based agents.

Educational Content and Modules:

  • Integrated with gameplay to provide learning opportunities.
  • Dependent on game scenarios and player progress.

DATA STRUCTURES

The design of data structures is critical to manage the complex information within the game. Key structures might include:

  • Player Data:

  • Personal information (anonymized for privacy).

  • Game progress, decisions, and achievements.

  • Environmental Data:

    • Multidimensional geospatial data.
    • Time-series data representing changes in the environment.
  • AI Generated Content:

  • Metadata describing content generated by AI technologies.

  • Links to rendered images, 3D models, and scenarios.

  • Game Scenarios:

    • Descriptions of environmental challenges and decision-making opportunities.
    • Outcomes based on player decisions and environmental interactions.
  • Educational Resources:

    • Structured data for modules, quizzes, and informational content.
    • Player interaction and completion status.
  • Ecosystem Models:

    • Data representing different ecosystems and species.
    • Models of ecological interactions and dependencies.
  • Economic System Data:

    • Virtual currency transactions and balances.
    • Rewards, achievements, and their criteria.
    • Feedback and Analytics:
  • Feedback and Analystics: Player feedback and suggestions. Game performance and usage statistics.

INTEGRATION and INTEROPERABILITY

  • Ensure that data structures are designed for interoperability between different systems and components.
  • Use standardized data formats and APIs for seamless integration and data exchange.