Improve playbook script and documention #11747
Conversation
* Add good error massage if you can't access the ssg module
Mab879
added
Infrastructure
|
Start a new ephemeral environment with changes proposed in this pull request: Fedora Environment Oracle Linux 8 Environment |
|
🤖 A k8s content image for this PR is available at: Click here to see how to deploy itIf you alread have Compliance Operator deployed: Otherwise deploy the content and operator together by checking out ComplianceAsCode/compliance-operator and: |
Mab879
changed the title
| if(SSG_PRODUCT_RHEL9) | ||
| file(MAKE_DIRECTORY "${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/roles") | ||
| add_test( | ||
| NAME "utils-ansible-playbook-to-role-rhel9" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is there any GitHub CI job that runs this test?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I will update the requirements to make the tests run.
So the tests in utils/ansible_playbook_to_role.py run.
|
Code Climate has analyzed commit e8174ec and detected 0 issues on this pull request. The test coverage on the diff in this pull request is 100.0% (50% is the threshold). This pull request will bring the total coverage in the repository to 59.3% (0.0% change). View more on Code Climate. |
|
/packit retest-failed |
Description:
utils/ansible_playbook_to_role.pyutils/ansible_playbook_to_role.pyRationale:
Follow up to #11495
Review Hints:
Follow the steps in the new docs.