You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
BiP 0039 is fast becoming the standard for mnemonic code creation as a seed for generating deterministic keys.
This is important because most hardware wallets are supporting it (e.g. Trezor, Ledger, etc.) as their primary means of generating keys.
At login, a user could select "Watch-Only" and Counterwallet could use the Master Public Key to load addresses and balances and a hardware wallet would store all of the corresponding private keys. All signing of transactions could then be passed from Counterwallet to the hardware device.
_Or you could just login with the Master Public Key anyway. Could this be done now? Regardless of BIP 0039 support or not._
EDIT: Currently Counterwallet uses Electrum-compatible seeds, not BIP 0039 seeds. The option to chose either at login would be great.
As a consequence of BIP 0039 support, BIP 0044 could be implemented. This could lend itself to a very interesting use case by registering XCP as a new "Coin Type". This would allow for the natural separation of BTC and XCP (and Counterparty Assets) within the same wallet.
BiP 0039 is fast becoming the standard for mnemonic code creation as a seed for generating deterministic keys.
This is important because most hardware wallets are supporting it (e.g. Trezor, Ledger, etc.) as their primary means of generating keys.
At login, a user could select "Watch-Only" and Counterwallet could use the Master Public Key to load addresses and balances and a hardware wallet would store all of the corresponding private keys. All signing of transactions could then be passed from Counterwallet to the hardware device.
_Or you could just login with the Master Public Key anyway. Could this be done now? Regardless of BIP 0039 support or not._
EDIT: Currently Counterwallet uses Electrum-compatible seeds, not BIP 0039 seeds. The option to chose either at login would be great.
As a consequence of BIP 0039 support, BIP 0044 could be implemented. This could lend itself to a very interesting use case by registering XCP as a new "Coin Type". This would allow for the natural separation of BTC and XCP (and Counterparty Assets) within the same wallet.
Want to back this issue? Post a bounty on it! We accept bounties via Bountysource.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: