Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Shop / replay back button is not consistent with item button #53

Closed
Sloofy opened this issue Apr 10, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed

Shop / replay back button is not consistent with item button #53

Sloofy opened this issue Apr 10, 2022 · 2 comments
Assignees
@CriticalFlaw
Labels
bug report A general purpose bug report.

Comments

@Sloofy
Copy link
Contributor

Sloofy commented Apr 10, 2022 •
edited

Issue

When accessing the Mann Co. Store, the back button to leave the store does not align with the items button. This is unlike the behaviour shown in the items menu, which has its positioned corrected to match.

Specifications

Fedora Linux 35
Using the community branch up to the April 3rd, 2022 version
Playing at 1920x1080

Screenshot

Store
@Sloofy
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sloofy commented Apr 10, 2022

This issue also affects the replay menu as well.

@Sloofy Sloofy changed the title Shop back button is not consistent with item button Shop / replay back button is not consistent with item button Apr 10, 2022
@CriticalFlaw CriticalFlaw added the bug report A general purpose bug report. label Apr 13, 2022
CriticalFlaw added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 24, 2022
@CriticalFlaw
Corrections for #53 and #54
33a8df2
@CriticalFlaw CriticalFlaw self-assigned this Apr 24, 2022
@CriticalFlaw
Copy link
Owner

Addressed in 33a8df2

@Sloofy Sloofy mentioned this issue Apr 24, 2022
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@CriticalFlaw CriticalFlaw

Labels
bug report A general purpose bug report.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@CriticalFlaw @Sloofy