RelevanceStacktrace.jl

Find the error as fast as possible!

Most important elements in the stacktrace:

1. error source file that you edit
   1. file + filename + line number
   2. function name
   3. stack depth counter
   4. modul name
2. other project files
3. other internal files

So let's design it like this! -> RelevanceStacktrace

Why

Stacktrace is for locating the error. Let's FOCUS ONLY on that.

With this package in the past years I literally forgot what does searching for error is as I just click on the BOLD GREEN filename with a ctrl + click in vscode each time.

Green! Because locating the error is a good thing. Not bad! So "Julia locate the right file and highlight it for us! ;) "

I think 99% of the time the error will be in the the first error of the stacktrace from your project's files. >> So it highlights it! :)

Any other time you will always have the unhighlighted parts. :)

Demo

Artificial error, to see it's power:

using RelevanceStacktrace
func4(x) = begin
	x+=x
	x=sum(x) .* [5, 3]
	x=sum(x[3])
	return x/3
end
func3(x) = x+5 + func4(x)
func2(x) = x+3 + func3(x)
func1(x) = begin
	func2(x)
end
func1(3)

In real life example it is even more useful.

Long stacktrace error:

sum([])

This is still nice I think, but to be honest RelevanceStacktrace shines better when the error is in some of your project file.

INSTALL

] add RelevanceStacktrace
using RelevanceStacktrace

or

using Pkg; Pkg.add("RelevanceStacktrace")
using RelevanceStacktrace

Fun fact

Debug the Debug. :D We catch the error in the error handling and do a very basic error printing mechanism, so we can debug the backtrace printing error.

The relevant errors are green, because finding one is a good thing! ;)

Fallback to raw stacktrace printing. As the project is sort of experimental, if a special case happen that we just don't bother to handle, it will fall back to print it in a basic format.

Future works?

Module names are useless. Actually we could drop the modul names as it just waste of space

Function param types are pretty useless. Maybe we could just show function names and parameters::types if it is actually matters... (As it is used very very rarely!)

AbbreviatedStackTraces sounds interesting We could merge it into this project with an optional flag maybe later on?

Great stacktraces

• AbbreviatedStackTraces: great project. :) https://github.com/BioTurboNick/AbbreviatedStackTraces.jl As UX decision I didn't merged it as the variation of stacktrace can create interruption in the thinking. We expect the output to be always the same. But of course more test should be done if someone believe it can be useful.
• ClearStacktrace: was great for inspiration! https://github.com/jkrumbiegel/ClearStacktrace.jl

Note

(only tested on Linux (Ubuntu) for Julia 1.8! )

(earlier version was tested on Linux (Ubuntu) for Julia 1.6 and 1.7! )

(It doesn't work in notebooks as it use different coloring. USE VSCODE! )