Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Input interface should be more user friendly #76

Open
jaapaurelio opened this issue Sep 29, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Input interface should be more user friendly #76

jaapaurelio opened this issue Sep 29, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@jaapaurelio
Copy link

jaapaurelio commented Sep 29, 2021

It took me a while to understand that the interrogation mark it's actually the submit button. It really looks like an help button. Also, it's missing the cursor pointer.
First time I tried I input parent first, child second, seems more natural to a coder. I was confused with the result.
The arrow to change the parent/child relation is very confusing, giving no indication what is parent what is child.

I would suggest having a code like approach. Where child is inside (bellow/after) parent.

Also, clicking the arrows would in fact change the inputs values.
No need to keep arrows active, since we can swap as many times as we want.

I'm not a designer, but something like this.

Screenshot 2021-09-29 at 18 58 04

@CyberLight
Copy link
Owner

Hi, @jaapaurelio !

Thank you for your feedback.

  • I agree about the button! Right to make it clearer, I really need to replace the question mark with text.

  • Regarding the strange behavior of the swap button of tag names:
    The thing is, I am not using client-side JS at all. For this reason, everything is done using CSS and HTML (switching tabs in the mobile view, activating the swap button also without JS).
    In the future, I think to use client-side JS in order to make UI more comfortable to use.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants