We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hey there,
My name is Maciej Mensfeld and I run security & quality assessment for Ruby libraries using Diffend.io.
While reviewing the changes for this lib, I noticed, that the vendor directory is being included.
Is this needed? Usually, it's added by mistake and causes:
a) confusion b) problems when tracking changes c) extensive library size
ref: LINK - see the vendor dir
Withouot vendor this package instead of 12MB would be around 35KB
If the presence of vendor data is valid I would love the reasoning. Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This applies to all packages released to RubyGems yesterday
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Hey there,
My name is Maciej Mensfeld and I run security & quality assessment for Ruby libraries using Diffend.io.
While reviewing the changes for this lib, I noticed, that the vendor directory is being included.
Is this needed? Usually, it's added by mistake and causes:
a) confusion
b) problems when tracking changes
c) extensive library size
ref: LINK - see the vendor dir
Withouot vendor this package instead of 12MB would be around 35KB
If the presence of vendor data is valid I would love the reasoning. Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: