Merge pull request #103 from mrmonday/patch-3

Fix a couple of typos.

regular-expression.dd

@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ void main(string argv[]){
     )
     $(P Now, come to think of it, this tiny sample showed a lot of useful things already:
         $(UL
-        $(LI a row string literal of form r"...", that allows writing a regex pattern in its natural notation )
+        $(LI a raw string literal of form r"...", that allows writing a regex pattern in its natural notation )
         $(LI $(D match) function, is an universal tool that we'll see in other work scenarios as well.
         To check if there was a match on a string, just test the return value explicitly as boolean.  )
         $(LI when trying to match special regex characters like  +, *, (, ), [, ] and $ don't forget to use escaping with \ )
@@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ assert(m.captures[1] == "31");
     $(P In this particular case it matched roughly 50% faster for me though I haven't done comprehensive analysis of this case.
     Not to spoil the excitement, but as of this writing the feature is experimental and temporarily lacks some extensions.
     Continuing the gloomy trend, be warned that compiler might choke on it, and it's also less tested. 
-    That being sad, there is no doubt ctRegex facility will only improve over time.
+    That being said, there is no doubt ctRegex facility will only improve over time.
     So start with run-time version, then go compile-time if willing to experiment or
     when need to squeeze out some more performance.
     )