Fix grammar issues 12810, 13310, 13329 #634
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…ructors List grammars for `immutable(int).init` and `immutable(int)(1)`.
…te parameters in the wrong order
|
LGTM |
|
Thanks for the review. |
9rnsr
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 28, 2014
Fix grammar issues 12810, 13310, 13329
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Issue 12810 - PrimaryExpression grammar does not allow type constructors
Issue 13310 - Old style multiple alias declaration not documented
Issue 13329 - AutoDeclarationX grammar lists '=' token and template parameters in the wrong order