New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
change the candidate's input resolution #20
Comments
Thanks for your questions. This macro structure will downsample twice and have a global pooling layer before the last FC layer. Therefore, this structure is resolution-agnostic. You can use either 1616 inputs as ImageNet-16-120, or 3232 for CIFAR, or 256*256 for your datasets. Having said that, for the 256 * 256 input resolution, 2 downsampling layer in the network may not be enough regarding the model capacity. While that is another question. In sum, so far, the |
Thanks a lot for your fast response.
obtains a config appropriate for cifar10 completely agnostic to the pre-defined input resolution in get_datasets function, right? and If I simply resize cifar10 size to e.g. 64 or 128 in the get_datasets function, the appropriate results can still be obtained (except the number of downsampling issue that you mentioned)? |
Hi! I was thinking about some changes in my project and I came back to our topic again :) +Where and how in here can I increase the number of downsample layers? how many do U suggest for input C of 128 and 256?
Thanks a lot for you help! <3 |
To increase the number of downsample layers, you need to change the definition of |
Hi, I would like to use you NATS-Bench for other datasets except cifar and Imagenet, and with higher resolutions like (256*256). Is it possible to sample a network like what you did for cifar below and then change the cells resolutions?
#then a code to change the input resolution to the target size of 256*256
Thanks for your response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: