Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

almost nothing has virtual destructors #76

Open
jjwilke opened this issue Feb 4, 2018 · 2 comments
Open

almost nothing has virtual destructors #76

jjwilke opened this issue Feb 4, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

@jjwilke
Copy link
Contributor

jjwilke commented Feb 4, 2018

all abstract objects need virtual destructors

jjwilke pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 4, 2018
@dhollman
Copy link
Contributor

@jjwilke Can you be more specific with this? I have virtual destructors on everything that I can find in the backend API. There are a few things where the virtual destructor is private or deleted because the object is never supposed to be deleted via a pointer to that object. Other things without virtual destructors are that way because they're not supposed to have vtables.

@jjwilke
Copy link
Contributor Author

jjwilke commented Feb 12, 2018 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants