Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Feature allow disable reference checks #249

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 14, 2020
Merged

Feature allow disable reference checks #249

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 14, 2020

Conversation

JPercival
Copy link
Contributor

@JPercival JPercival commented Sep 10, 2020 •
edited

  • Added configuration for forcing / ignoring referential integrity checks on delete / write

@JPercival JPercival self-assigned this Sep 10, 2020
@JPercival JPercival changed the base branch from master to feature-hapi-502 September 10, 2020 19:34
Base automatically changed from feature-hapi-502 to develop September 14, 2020 15:49
@JPercival JPercival force-pushed the feature-allow-disable-reference-checks branch from f143735 to 5b68c2c Compare September 14, 2020 16:31
sliver007
sliver007 approved these changes Sep 14, 2020
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@sliver007 sliver007 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good!

@sliver007 sliver007 merged commit f6e7021 into develop Sep 14, 2020
@sliver007 sliver007 deleted the feature-allow-disable-reference-checks branch September 14, 2020 16:38
@renovate renovate bot mentioned this pull request Nov 14, 2021
Open
1 task
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@sliver007 sliver007 sliver007 approved these changes

@brynrhodes brynrhodes Awaiting requested review from brynrhodes

Assignees

@JPercival JPercival

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@JPercival @sliver007