Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

0209 update settings to complete rollover #1586

Merged
merged 11 commits into from Oct 5, 2020

Conversation

defong
Copy link
Contributor

@defong defong commented Oct 5, 2020

Context

Rollover

Changes proposed in this pull request

Rollovered

Guidance to review

Best to view by commits
Config change cause some broken tests due to hardcoring.
As well as the ethereal nature of recruitment cycle vs allocation year over allocation

Checklist

  • Make sure all information from the Trello card is in here
  • Attach to Trello card
  • Rebased master
  • Cleaned commit history
  • Tested by running locally

@defong
Copy link
Contributor Author

defong commented Oct 5, 2020

@defong
Copy link
Contributor Author

defong commented Oct 5, 2020

@defong defong closed this Oct 5, 2020
@defong defong reopened this Oct 5, 2020
@defong defong force-pushed the 0209-update-settings-to-complete-rollover branch from 9ea6b94 to 72adf30 Compare October 5, 2020 11:06
Need to lock down none moveable settings
Retained hardcore value for recruitment cycle year
This is so it relies on settings current recruitment cycle year
(rollovered) insteads.
This is to constrained recruitment year to the rollovered cycle
The tests needs to be within the current recruitment year (rollovered).
This is so that the tests operate beyond the realm or current
recruitment cycle.
@defong defong force-pushed the 0209-update-settings-to-complete-rollover branch from 72adf30 to 49f570d Compare October 5, 2020 14:31
# Note: the concept of recruitment cycle here is ethereal.
# it is tied to a recruitment cycle that is associated to
# Settings.allocation_cycle_year
allocation_recruitment_cycle
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In the settings we call this allocation cycle. That makes more sense than allocation recruitment cycle, in my mind at least, should we use that or is the longer version correct?

Copy link
Contributor

@misaka misaka left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approving as we're short on time.

@defong defong merged commit 2a8a05c into master Oct 5, 2020
@defong defong deleted the 0209-update-settings-to-complete-rollover branch October 5, 2020 16:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants