You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you so much for releasing the code! I encountered a problem when doing evaluation in stage one, music-exp. I found the annotation name in solotest.json is not consistent with the processed data.
For example: in solotest.json, video "1Ju4S0qeDqw", the original fps is 25pfs, so frame_116 should corresponds to around 2900th frame (116*25). In my data folder (I followed cut_video.py), it is true, but in solotest.json, it shows a frame of 3480.jpg. Based on my understanding, 3480.jpg should corresponds to 139th seconds of the video (3480/25=139.2). Other annotations are in similar situations. Can you give some tips on how to deal with it? Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,
I think I found the reason. It seems that all the videos are in 30 fps and you extract a frame every 7 frames according to the annotations you provided (save every 7 frames).
Dear authors,
Thank you so much for releasing the code! I encountered a problem when doing evaluation in stage one, music-exp. I found the annotation name in solotest.json is not consistent with the processed data.
For example: in solotest.json, video "1Ju4S0qeDqw", the original fps is 25pfs, so frame_116 should corresponds to around 2900th frame (116*25). In my data folder (I followed cut_video.py), it is true, but in solotest.json, it shows a frame of 3480.jpg. Based on my understanding, 3480.jpg should corresponds to 139th seconds of the video (3480/25=139.2). Other annotations are in similar situations. Can you give some tips on how to deal with it? Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: