Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

>mdial #245

Open
Rexogamer opened this issue Jul 14, 2020 · 9 comments
Open

>mdial #245

Rexogamer opened this issue Jul 14, 2020 · 9 comments

Comments

@Rexogamer
Copy link
Member

Rexogamer commented Jul 14, 2020

This command would let you call multiple numbers at once!

questions:

  • should there be a limit to how many you could have in one call
  • should it be a VIP feature
    • if so, can you mdial non vip numbers
  • should there be a credit cost for doing so
@SunburntRock89
Copy link
Member

SunburntRock89 commented Jul 14, 2020

>conference ?

@Rexogamer
Copy link
Member Author

I was thinking >m(ulti)dial becuz it kinda fits with our naming scheme (dial/rdial/adial(might get added in V4))

@turret-dev
Copy link
Member

so like you can have multiple people in the call? like a 3 way or 4 way call?

@hpenney2
Copy link

that's what I'm understand this as. I think there definitely should be a limit for how many numbers (participants?) can be in one call otherwise it'd be chaotic. Someone being called should be told that it's an mcall/conference and how many people are in said mcall, also how will this be formatted in #bot-log?

@Rexogamer
Copy link
Member Author

so like you can have multiple people in the call? like a 3 way or 4 way call?

precisely

that's what I'm understand this as. I think there definitely should be a limit for how many numbers (participants?) can be in one call otherwise it'd be chaotic.

I think 4 is a good maximum, maybe even 5

Someone being called should be told that it's an mcall/conference and how many people are in said mcall,

yeah, maybe even list the numbers involved

also how will this be formatted in #bot-log?

maybe something like "User invited insert number here to conference call call id from users number"?

@LaNgOStInode
Copy link

I was thinking >m(ulti)dial becuz it kinda fits with our naming scheme (dial/rdial/adial(might get added in V4))

what's adial?

This command would let you call multiple numbers at once!

questions:

  • should there be a limit to how many you could have in one call

  • should it be a VIP feature

    • if so, can you mdial non vip numbers
  • should there be a credit cost for doing so

Yes, the limit should be like 3 or 4 other people in the call at first. The whole idea is already disorganized, so the less the better
No, it shouldn't be a VIP feature. What if you found cool people on there and want them to meet eachother, but don't have VIP?
If it is a VIP feature, yes let VIPs dial non-VIP numbers
There should be a credit cost. 5 credits per person sounds good to me.
Also, it should be CCALL or GCALL, because Conference Call and Group Call sound better than Multi Call (at least to me)

@Mitchell3514
Copy link
Member

Will be in v4.

I agree with @LaNgOStInode that it shouldn't be a VIP feature. Instead, this will most likely tie into the progression system.

Limits to be further discussed.

@turret-dev
Copy link
Member

what would limits be based on? the highest-leveled-number, the lowest-leveled-number, the number who started the call, or the number whos attempting to add a new person? limits would be the amount of people per call, so some rando couldnt just call literally every number in dtel

@turret-dev
Copy link
Member

^ i would say "the number whos attempting to add a new person." so we could add like a "Maybe ask another number in the call to add this number?" also, we could add the number the person is in during the call in the message format.
ex: (0800support) turret.#1938 :phone: heyyyyyyyy

@Rexogamer Rexogamer added the V4 label Feb 11, 2021
@Mitchell3514 Mitchell3514 removed the V4 label May 15, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants