-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 95
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Consider mirroring repos to Codeberg #131
Comments
BTW, I've written a seperate repo about mirroring to Codeberg: https://codeberg.org/Recommendations/Mirror_to_Codeberg |
Cool idea |
There are a few proprietary components in gitlab. the rest are self-hosted (difficult and time-consuming, not as popular as codeberg) codeberg has a good interface and some popularity |
In https://codeberg.org/Recommendations/Mirror_to_Codeberg, I mentioned some bad things of GitLab:
SourceHut looks fine, however Codeberg's interface is very user-friendly, similiar to GitHub. SourceHut is sorta more complex to use. SourceHut does have a cool perk is that you can contribute without creating an account, however, the workflow will be very unfamiliar and more mentally taxing for novice users to learn. |
sourcehut is not as popular as codeberg, but also a good option |
Okay, now I understand |
Would you mind please explaining the reasons that you decided not to go to Codeberg, please? |
@throwaway-d How long does it take to set the mirroring? If the person doesnt have this kind of experience? |
I think it is quick to set the mirroring. |
@throwaway-d so less than 15 minutes? |
Probably. I think it could be 15 - 20 mins. |
Hello @Darkempire78 I believe us should mirror our repos to Codeberg because:
Here are some sources for you:
FAQ
Q: - GitHub Actions -- this is a huge time saver for me
- Forcing all contributors to modify their current setup and move to another hosting -- we may just lose contributors in the end
A: As I said, we only just mirror. The repo will be available and contributable on both sites.
Q: - Transferring issues -- is this possible? Issues here represent a technical knowledge base we can't live without
- Transferring wiki and all edit history -- possible?
A: Yes, it is possible.
a. Example for issues:
b. Example for commits:
c. Example for wiki:
Q: Despite having mirror/s, the project will still continue to be operated from GitHub for development, so having yet another mirror doesn't solve anything.
A: You can create issues, contribute, view the repos on there without going to GitHub! Example:
Q: How does Codeberg mirror comments from GitHub?
A: It uses Access Token.
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/121148372/209098935-5b16df71-9832-4e2f-8a12-e8911d5e7e66.png)
Q: My repos are very bandwidth-intensive projects, and I have my doubts as to whether the owner(s) of Codeberg would be prepared for such a massive bandwidth rate increase. I've also had individual projects be disabled on small sites before due to taking too much bandwidth.
A: Oh.. I think you should directly ask https://docs.codeberg.org/contact/ about if they are ready for massive bandwidth rate increase.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: