Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Lack of enough communication and regular meetings with the community by DCG #11

Open
awesomedash opened this issue Feb 7, 2021 · 5 comments

Comments

@awesomedash
Copy link
Collaborator

awesomedash commented Feb 7, 2021

DCG currently holds regular quarterly calls, however it has come up again and again that the community and in particular MNOs would like to have regular Q&A meetings with DCG execs. We believe a better communication from DCG not only provides more confidence in Dash investors but also would significantly reduce negative feedback and time to time attempts of DCG micromanagement by MNOs.

@awesomedash
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Link to one of recent discussions.

@troydash
Copy link

troydash commented Feb 7, 2021

Also suggested: utilize trust protectors as intermediaries between MNO and DCG execs when it comes to feedback on DCG exec performance. TPs could be in a position to more productively summarize MNO feedback for the DCG board, resulting in more actionable items and in a more structured format than a chat for example.
Currently, when feedback is negative, it has a tendency to turn into an informal witch-hunt of sorts, which fosters negative energy so to speak, and can leave individual DCG members in an uncomfortable position. So my concern is also specifically with turning more feedback into constructive feedback.

@awesomedash
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Another forum post about it.

@baby-giraffe
Copy link

Also suggested: utilize trust protectors as intermediaries between MNO and DCG execs when it comes to feedback on DCG exec performance. TPs could be in a position to more productively summarize MNO feedback for the DCG board, resulting in more actionable items and in a more structured format than a chat for example.
Currently, when feedback is negative, it has a tendency to turn into an informal witch-hunt of sorts, which fosters negative energy so to speak, and can leave individual DCG members in an uncomfortable position. So my concern is also specifically with turning more feedback into constructive feedback.

They do already perform this function to a great extent, btw. I schedule a call about 2-3 weeks after the quarterly specifically to provide them some time for gathering and synthesizing feedback from the community. We do have substantive discussions on several topics every quarter... but I'm uncertain how well the outcomes from those discussions filter back to the community from the TPs. Would be interested in hearing whether the community is adequately exposed afterward. If not, I could suggest some changes for TPs to more formally report back to the MNOs and community as a whole (in a structured way - the topics discussed and the outcomes).

@awesomedash
Copy link
Collaborator Author

The first AMA meeting will happen on 19th February at 11AM EST / 4PM UTC.
The AMA will be broadcasted live on the official Dash social media: YouTube, Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn accounts.
Link to the announcement.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants