New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Lack of enough communication and regular meetings with the community by DCG #11
Comments
Link to one of recent discussions. |
Also suggested: utilize trust protectors as intermediaries between MNO and DCG execs when it comes to feedback on DCG exec performance. TPs could be in a position to more productively summarize MNO feedback for the DCG board, resulting in more actionable items and in a more structured format than a chat for example. |
Another forum post about it. |
They do already perform this function to a great extent, btw. I schedule a call about 2-3 weeks after the quarterly specifically to provide them some time for gathering and synthesizing feedback from the community. We do have substantive discussions on several topics every quarter... but I'm uncertain how well the outcomes from those discussions filter back to the community from the TPs. Would be interested in hearing whether the community is adequately exposed afterward. If not, I could suggest some changes for TPs to more formally report back to the MNOs and community as a whole (in a structured way - the topics discussed and the outcomes). |
The first AMA meeting will happen on 19th February at 11AM EST / 4PM UTC. |
DCG currently holds regular quarterly calls, however it has come up again and again that the community and in particular MNOs would like to have regular Q&A meetings with DCG execs. We believe a better communication from DCG not only provides more confidence in Dash investors but also would significantly reduce negative feedback and time to time attempts of DCG micromanagement by MNOs.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: