Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Default skip_ssl_validation into false #693

Merged

Conversation

jingkaihe
Copy link
Contributor

@jingkaihe jingkaihe commented Feb 25, 2020

Related issue: #692

Modified comments on skip_ssl_validation that suggests true/false is supported value to be populated into datadog config, which is compatible across agent v5, v6, and v7

@@ -247,7 +247,7 @@
default['datadog']['web_proxy']['port'] = nil
default['datadog']['web_proxy']['user'] = nil
default['datadog']['web_proxy']['password'] = nil
default['datadog']['web_proxy']['skip_ssl_validation'] = nil # accepted values 'yes' or 'no'
default['datadog']['web_proxy']['skip_ssl_validation'] = false
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we keep it nil here and just change the comment? This way it won't appear in the configuration if not set, thus using the default.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the feedback. I've addressed the comment.

Tweak comments on skip_ssl_validation that suggests true/false is supported value to be populated into datadog config, which is compatible across agent v5, v6, and v7
@jingkaihe jingkaihe force-pushed the default-skip-ssl-validation-to-false branch from 26c4972 to c64dd40 Compare March 2, 2020 18:16
@albertvaka
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks a lot for finding this! Merging :)

@albertvaka albertvaka merged commit 483f88a into DataDog:master Mar 4, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants