Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rename Profiling files to reflect "datadog" instead of "ddtrace" #3502

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 5, 2024

Conversation

delner
Copy link
Contributor

@delner delner commented Mar 1, 2024

What does this PR do?

Changes the names/filepaths of the profiling code to reflect "datadog" instead of "ddtrace". Should not functionally change anything, or contain any breaking changes.

Motivation:

Per @ivoanjo 's suggestion that we extract the profiling rename from a larger rename PR. This change seems isolated and internal, which should make it a good candidate for its own PR.

Additional Notes:

This is an early step towards a larger rename to datadog in 2.0. There may be more changes to the C code (constant names) or other references to ddtrace. Those changes will happen in another PR.

@delner delner added dev/refactor Involves refactoring existing components profiling Involves Datadog profiling labels Mar 1, 2024
@delner delner self-assigned this Mar 1, 2024
@delner delner added the dev/internal Other internal work that does not need to be included in the changelog label Mar 1, 2024
@delner delner force-pushed the refactor/rename_profiling_files_to_datadog branch 3 times, most recently from 9abd38b to 0a4157d Compare March 4, 2024 15:20
@delner delner marked this pull request as ready for review March 4, 2024 15:25
@delner delner requested review from a team as code owners March 4, 2024 15:25
@delner delner force-pushed the refactor/rename_profiling_files_to_datadog branch from 0a4157d to cee639d Compare March 4, 2024 19:51
@delner delner requested a review from ivoanjo March 4, 2024 19:52
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 98.23%. Comparing base (9741fee) to head (cee639d).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #3502   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.23%   98.23%           
=======================================
  Files        1275     1275           
  Lines       75182    75182           
  Branches     3551     3551           
=======================================
  Hits        73858    73858           
  Misses       1324     1324           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Member

@ivoanjo ivoanjo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 LGTM

@delner delner force-pushed the refactor/rename_profiling_files_to_datadog branch from cee639d to ca64085 Compare March 5, 2024 14:53
@delner delner force-pushed the refactor/rename_profiling_files_to_datadog branch from ca64085 to 6a5dda4 Compare March 5, 2024 15:51
@delner delner merged commit e9cb75c into master Mar 5, 2024
218 of 219 checks passed
@delner delner deleted the refactor/rename_profiling_files_to_datadog branch March 5, 2024 16:10
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the 2.0 milestone Mar 5, 2024
@ivoanjo ivoanjo modified the milestones: 2.0, 1.21.0 Mar 14, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dev/internal Other internal work that does not need to be included in the changelog dev/refactor Involves refactoring existing components profiling Involves Datadog profiling
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants