Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added ability to specify global tags as part of configuration #3

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

chriskinsman
Copy link

In our environment we only want to run a single instance of the DogStatsD agent. We then need to configure each server to tag their stats as being related to a particular host so that we can filter and graph across hosts. This pull request allows you to set a tag at config time that will be applied to all stats. We are adding a tag called hosts with a value of Naming.CurrentHostName so that all stats are tagged with this.

@cjzzz
Copy link

cjzzz commented Nov 4, 2016

@yannmh Any chance this could be rebased and pulled?

@yannmh yannmh added this to the 3.1 milestone Nov 4, 2016
@yannmh
Copy link
Member

yannmh commented Nov 4, 2016

Adding it to the 3.1 milestone. This waited for too long and would be certainly helpful!

@jocco
Copy link

jocco commented Jan 18, 2017

Hey

This looks incredibly useful for environment as well to specify globally available data for our application (like version number) that isnt available on the agent level. Would it be possible to get this pulled into the official datadog integration? Thx.

@irabinovitch
Copy link
Contributor

@yannmh Do we have a schedule for 3.1? Should we ask for a rebase here?

@swASO
Copy link

swASO commented Jul 30, 2018

something new here ? 3.1 was released but without this PR

@yannmh
Copy link
Member

yannmh commented Mar 29, 2019

Apologies for the delay here.
We added those changes as part of https://github.com/DataDog/dogstatsd-csharp-client/pull/78/files.
You will be credited in the changelog and release notes.
Thanks again.

@yannmh yannmh closed this Mar 29, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants