Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DFIP #2: DeFi incentive funding #2

Closed
3 tasks done
uzyn opened this issue Aug 18, 2020 · 7 comments
Closed
3 tasks done

DFIP #2: DeFi incentive funding #2

uzyn opened this issue Aug 18, 2020 · 7 comments
Labels
dfip DeFi Improvement Proposal passed Proposal passed rfc Request for Comment

Comments

@uzyn
Copy link
Member

uzyn commented Aug 18, 2020

Overview

DeFiChain will be launching various decentralized financial (DeFi) transactions soon. As with all financial services, centralized or decentralized alike, liquidity is key in adoption. An exchange with a bare order book would not be attracting much trading action.

Yield Farming is created for the same reason, to drive adoption and action for many DeFi activities, especially that of new protocols and services. DeFiChain requires a mechanism for us to drive adoption.

Increasing miner reward

With the recent move by DeFiChain Foundation to unstake all its 288 nodes, and placing them into a single publicly-verifiable address, staking reward for DeFiChain has seen a major increase in yield. Before this move, stakers receive about 25% - 28% of mining reward p.a., since the unstaking of foundation nodes, stakers now receive 50% - 60% of mining reward p.a.

Proposal

25% of miner reward to be set aside into a smart contract for DeFi incentive funding.

If this proposal and the previous one (#1) passes, block reward would look as follows:

  • 135 DFI as mining reward for masternode
  • 45 DFI goes to DeFi incentive funding smart contract
  • 19.9 DFI goes to community fund
  • 0.1 DFI goes to Bitcoin anchor reward smart contract

Upon approval, this proposal will be implemented during the next hard fork.

Stage

  • Request for Comment (RFC)
  • Voting
  • Result - PASSED

This proposal is currently on RFC stage for discussion. Once it gets the initial general understanding and acceptance, it will then proceed to voting stage. Voting will be conducted by masternodes. As this is likely one of the first votes of DeFiChain, voting instructions will be announced in due time.

Voting

Masternode snapshot will be taken at block 294,000 of DeFiChain mainnet.

Voting will open until Monday, 21 September 2020 00:00 UTC. Please post your votes and proofs here in this GitHub issue before the closing time.

Refer to README for voting instructions.

Vote options

  • Yes, I agree. Sign: dfip-2 yes
  • No, I do not agree. Sign: dfip-2 no
  • Neutral. Sign: dfip-2 neutral.

Results

21 votes received.

20 masternodes voted for yes. 1 voted for no.

DFIP #1 passes.

@uzyn uzyn added draft rfc Request for Comment and removed draft labels Aug 18, 2020
@corneliakrause
Copy link

If you like to grow a business you have to invest in it. So I agree

@robcoins
Copy link

I would like to see Pool By Cake giving us plenty of slices in a long term. I would go for it.

@wkadar
Copy link

wkadar commented Aug 31, 2020

We need more user numbers led to more volume and capital.
To get more capital we have to open the gates.
Can we assume that the open gates will be safe?
The value in Cake Defi Trust has a big opportunity to grow.
I vote for it.

@PerDom
Copy link

PerDom commented Sep 3, 2020

I like the idea. I'll vote for it.

@uzyn uzyn changed the title DeFi incentive funding DFIP #2: DeFi incentive funding Sep 14, 2020
@mksigyt
Copy link

mksigyt commented Sep 15, 2020

dfip-2 neutral

@uzyn
Copy link
Member Author

uzyn commented Sep 18, 2020

Masternode votes from Cake DeFi (https://cakedefi.com) for DFIP #2

Raw voting results

Survey is carried out by Cake DeFi to their stakers.

Details: https://medium.com/@cakedefi/cakes-processing-of-defichain-s-dfips-1-2-bfacb66dc986

Raw voting results: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13xxMhm5_-wA_Yogng-mtU3p0zRUJ-tG7NeOHOJj0q8A/edit?usp=sharing

20 masternodes for YES

$ defi-cli signmessage 8VEcBnvWg4HrC1Qt1iYQJ3Vvuf252msaRU 'dfip-2 yes'
H+uWDe9vUxafnx9EwbGY48uyIKen1x4CmLoYpALC3sP/V1CWbuYiREAha//C/0n/VLfzGm67YTgLJUtVvbrrrTw=

$ defi-cli signmessage 8GDQwiYrQxomXNgtrnn1Rtd2r7sCBsuoDt 'dfip-2 yes'
H2OnSYk5Upb+yxeeQMyi1Omlf8egBR9IOlCbd6ZZ1LPmFeDdvcFqqwpl1y6296as/OU9qfFhcRvaNjsUBcZwiAU=

$ defi-cli signmessage 8UirEzTmzJe3qFjKNCamNi4BxWZhKNK2vM 'dfip-2 yes'
ILX4L5mCNv9TWarwm5Bia/WRTyHf0rIvl/IMuwL8YRlmQPUe/TtoN2isBsTtPwrL+kg7lU8Q67QVugxfAURueYI=

$ defi-cli signmessage 8Pyhd746fsFPtAdbCdn2dBkthCeFty9jmX 'dfip-2 yes'
IKKierkJzVPkDBlgxEQ/anY8JC64GTP2GWCFzKdqfNkVKs4OvSW+V4HO6k6YjpM/+eqxXKq0UcPl6RK0h025pYU=

$ defi-cli signmessage 8Pv6Tydvq58f8koa3rEXrz7aRV658SdsCJ 'dfip-2 yes'
H4NWCtcjgsYr3KUIGVxadlnWvvJI3Y1qSrOBJIBCBnGBa7YVud4hi67GJT0l9kplu3s+MszkrSyUTUWbAgocIxo=

$ defi-cli signmessage 8Wq5Vm6Y9HtsCw4ziLiHcmtcqGJEHmtJ6N 'dfip-2 yes'
IPbX5HHxTj7DxzaRIuigVpc3IZ1B/E0zUxb7R4wu4BIPX3oe6B7VH+N2NWKwN6Yg6/9swsxH51fsxDepM39FMwU=

$ defi-cli signmessage 8KeF3owaWK3icc37HPWsPtUq5jrCiDa3sK 'dfip-2 yes'
H85nGGkocGsuDjxYZtfgexwPC8iGWRHIhUzDFp69mqcffd51oKkTlJidzmf7vy851tWHhpJJZ6le/adPEOJmbp0=

$ defi-cli signmessage 8FQ67ZMTNMEbpQEUzZ5MbAFKKfJTo1uLNx 'dfip-2 yes'
HxEnaKo8xq44ehqPCQmEGU97gJ/xu4pch8MUNgOevkX9ZtFIkuzWCXMBITyXi6sDZDwJTGtB5sg+cqLJRMjQf2M=

$ defi-cli signmessage 8aw7NdLgTMRE7T59U4qPTbQNcuc2cC7rGB 'dfip-2 yes'
IL5+K2xZUgQp8y5DdWopmtqR63HXaLDxjG8QLl9NohkoCcAivgZW//YsFQGJZlpFyLl2WeKu1LXLchG/Y3hwMus=

$ defi-cli signmessage 8FphQuBa25UGYAK9F6HB3bh6ukRSbRsGMn 'dfip-2 yes'
IDYgG0NgVFVyDvHrF5jC+I84IXXlVC03nKKBPyqIP765B0IrMrP1O8p5n9+yyk68nqNwqxtc6Vo9n9qzyCsTotQ=

$ defi-cli signmessage 8WU4jSULSSc7Lz8xi6T8Qe6RXYmEno3YfZ 'dfip-2 yes'
HxE3X63WzSDqBZQSAkypoRDbcu2c/U+yYQZq/3KYwAVQLOutxU7fODlwSL83WaPlmddiwAtFsQTeg/nedPvKs9s=

$ defi-cli signmessage 8PTT1Yk89hbmUfgizxDyiCV8iMj46Uod3f 'dfip-2 yes'
ILzuG/78NQMitp4rTyKjYcG9eFd9MYyX5FG9GXs0PuRcK6qbpVepBlnhP9hmum4fuCWIwTbwv1QhhLjHt1jLBnw=

$ defi-cli signmessage 8RgFCLH6A99sZiiZdoamhbUJgCvMTWJuMk 'dfip-2 yes'
ILIIA5zaRbg4iFoojgL7zWZRYzmeHlw5eREkiD7HmAGjP7fKQE0Yeu9v7nXqO+lO91YTORTP/1KO+SzcOKhs1Ew=

$ defi-cli signmessage 8Wm14DjR6kiohatcmigKZUsAB6e9padB5j 'dfip-2 yes'
IGVfO+Y4OcND7GKXseO4MVMhgyo8bXqBXY2qzl2R0DlXXkxSbdon4qy0d3eD+rka4qhRb+bvuvwXinZpZGb77qk=

$ defi-cli signmessage 8S6dXTmZxb6hxEe9k4DEJbANDmqUqEjtFW 'dfip-2 yes'
H8K+NwYMh3N6Etivm0hOxahvcyhFmotB+4Lgec4+ghWbFQMVYiP/xritCcUfrRwHA5B9gzdey+ZQ+sMYvnco1TY=

$ defi-cli signmessage 8LnqhZQzFVwwaX7TUrTw3ckUffuz1pLYTf 'dfip-2 yes'
H0oqMbfneDgpSO/LZHF56KVVJ3QayS9FNSkg8oRjh3CSdy8eX+GEZxbdE/xhz5I8UwtUnXBA6JJBC84HS+1Y9bI=

$ defi-cli signmessage 8LiBz8jzjipCbZ3tMpivWYbP5DjCaK2dCp 'dfip-2 yes'
Hw1+h7MiQmy8jZ3eS//RVhdf0hd3lj+OhNT/Sxbt3UPHCbVXed7aYUphCedm3FipWbDzpq/Gm7y+JLhMd4OyvZM=

$ defi-cli signmessage 8VwszPSzgpJ7mDrck3GKdC5EVPpbifyPES 'dfip-2 yes'
IL8wSMCDq3j6m+D5hTgAUPXQ058J60r5cw6T8Zn0r3FhAZCUr07Jx5i6OXsnGVBi+ywGree0eDUHnG6ruFWhlCg=

$ defi-cli signmessage 8GarTcQUsmXoPtFN3Ty25Dbn5RgmTpfeAj 'dfip-2 yes'
H91YEBzNM6c+UJr/BqMNX3379TLY46RSVq9KcHNl+SZrNDfaIz/nDbdwQlQ8HudLd4xiT2vRACi0jTRCL5DgeDs=

$ defi-cli signmessage 8TWEeZAbijMzoHqCBC48jnEykpktZNoJvo 'dfip-2 yes'
HwN/l+fbe4NSQuUbvLmrjpkt5G02sV245U6MBPWY9yEIUbcoy5LL/pgxxZIqXKGAP1g5UO9AFe5ThKyBGsn8Gvw=

1 masternode for NO

$ defi-cli signmessage 8K4RTe6TnYDf5VtuuQw7MkZMU8cW4Pimfz 'dfip-2 no'
H+oJX83EDc9xeCYfIv1G6afa6C3k5dJ7ywYjsfAMKAHkb9UhiyOLqcjqgcO+y5AUhtWctoQqpsPQvkWPZi5RJRY=

@uzyn uzyn added the passed Proposal passed label Sep 21, 2020
@uzyn
Copy link
Member Author

uzyn commented Sep 21, 2020

Voting closed with 21 votes collected. 20 masternodes voted for yes, 1 voted for no.

DFIP #2 is thus passed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dfip DeFi Improvement Proposal passed Proposal passed rfc Request for Comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants