Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
108 lines (72 loc) · 5.98 KB

README_Product_System_design_Load-balancer.md

File metadata and controls

108 lines (72 loc) · 5.98 KB

Sub-topic of The NextGen Architectural Paradigm for designing "Hyper Scale Secured Resilient Product system"

Load balancer

	* Additional benefits of LB
		* SSL termination (Removes the need to install X.509 certificates)
		* Session persistence
	* Load Balancer - Route Traffic Method
		* Random
		* Least loaded
		* Session/cookies
		* Round robin or weighted round robin
		* Layer 4 load-balancing
		* Layer 7 load-balancing
	* Load Balancing Layers
		* Layer 4 load balancing(Transport Layer)
		* Layer 7 load balancing(Application Layer)

hyperscaler

Load balancer


Source: Scalable system design patterns

Load balancers distribute incoming client requests to computing resources such as application servers and databases. In each case, the load balancer returns the response from the computing resource to the appropriate client. Load balancers are effective at:

  • Preventing requests from going to unhealthy servers
  • Preventing overloading resources
  • Helping to eliminate a single point of failure

Load balancers can be implemented with hardware (expensive) or with software such as HAProxy.

Additional benefits of LB

  • SSL termination - Decrypt incoming requests and encrypt server responses so backend servers do not have to perform these potentially expensive operations
  • Session persistence - Issue cookies and route a specific client's requests to same instance if the web apps do not keep track of sessions

To protect against failures, it's common to set up multiple load balancers, either in active-passive or active-active mode.

Load Balancer - Route Traffic Method

Load balancers can route traffic based on various metrics, including:

Load Balancing - @ Layers

Layer 4 load balancing

Layer 4 load balancers look at info at the transport layer to decide how to distribute requests. Generally, this involves the source, destination IP addresses, and ports in the header, but not the contents of the packet. Layer 4 load balancers forward network packets to and from the upstream server, performing Network Address Translation (NAT).

Layer 7 load balancing

Layer 7 load balancers look at the application layer to decide how to distribute requests. This can involve contents of the header, message, and cookies. Layer 7 load balancers terminate network traffic, reads the message, makes a load-balancing decision, then opens a connection to the selected server. For example, a layer 7 load balancer can direct video traffic to servers that host videos while directing more sensitive user billing traffic to security-hardened servers.

At the cost of flexibility, layer 4 load balancing requires less time and computing resources than Layer 7, although the performance impact can be minimal on modern commodity hardware.

Horizontal scaling

Load balancers can also help with horizontal scaling, improving performance and availability. Scaling out using commodity machines is more cost efficient and results in higher availability than scaling up a single server on more expensive hardware, called Vertical Scaling. It is also easier to hire for talent working on commodity hardware than it is for specialized enterprise systems.

Disadvantage(s): horizontal scaling

  • Scaling horizontally introduces complexity and involves cloning servers
    • Servers should be stateless: they should not contain any user-related data like sessions or profile pictures
    • Sessions can be stored in a centralized data store such as a database (SQL, NoSQL) or a persistent cache (Redis, Memcached)
  • Downstream servers such as caches and databases need to handle more simultaneous connections as upstream servers scale out

Disadvantage(s): load balancer

  • The load balancer can become a performance bottleneck if it does not have enough resources or if it is not configured properly.
  • Introducing a load balancer to help eliminate a single point of failure results in increased complexity.
  • A single load balancer is a single point of failure, configuring multiple load balancers further increases complexity.

Source(s) and further reading

Contact info

Feel free to contact me to discuss any issues, questions, or comments.

My contact info can be found on my GitHub page.

License

I, The DeepHiveMind, am providing code and resources in this repository to you under custom Copyright & license (Copyright 2020 DeepHiveMind & Creative Commons Legal Code CC0 1.0 Universal). Please Refer to the Copyright 2020 DeepHiveMind License for further details as to this. Thanks!