Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

feat: no_std #44

Open
hussein-aitlahcen opened this issue Oct 15, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

feat: no_std #44

hussein-aitlahcen opened this issue Oct 15, 2022 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@hussein-aitlahcen
Copy link

hussein-aitlahcen commented Oct 15, 2022 •
edited
Loading

Hi, making this crate no_std would allow us to embed the crate itself as setup input and hence, having a recursive zkWasm?
@lanbones
Copy link
Contributor

lanbones commented Oct 17, 2022 •
edited
Loading

We would like to make it no_std to improve its portability, but we now have some feat in higher priority. I guess recursive zkWasm just depends on a verification key instead of the whole circuits, so the no_std is not that important for a recursive zkWasm.

@lanbones lanbones added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 17, 2022
@aseaday aseaday changed the title no_std feat: no_std Oct 23, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@lanbones @hussein-aitlahcen