docs(license): restore license to GNU AGPL #196
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Deuchnord
changed the title
Deuchnord
changed the title
Deuchnord
force-pushed
the
restore-license-agpl
branch
2 times, most recently
from
1d60a7b
to
8cba510
Compare
This reverts commit 6ffe0ad.
Deuchnord
force-pushed
the
restore-license-agpl
branch
from
8cba510
to
1059e70
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
After some weeks of thoughts, I have made the decision to revert #182 and come back to GNU Affero General Public License.
The main reason for this is that the AGPL reinforces the code sharing obligations of the GNU GPL, especially in the case that the software is run on a server.
When I read it again I don't get the impression that the CeCILL license applies to this case (it only talks about the case of distributing modified software), whereas the GNU AGPL does (section 6b of the license).
This is important to me in order to avoid some misuse of Kosmorro because of the visibility it seems to be starting to get (actually I didn't expect that one day one of my projects would get it).
I hope this revert will not be a problem for anyone.