Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Indexer ES document id #1028

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 10, 2023
Merged

Indexer ES document id #1028

merged 4 commits into from
Jan 10, 2023

Conversation

Mikwiss
Copy link
Contributor

@Mikwiss Mikwiss commented Jan 5, 2023

Hi @jnioche,

I saw the #1025 issue and your answer related to #671. That's was exactly the purpose of this PR !

In our case we use a random UUID to store the content (to keep all data). We add a new boolean parameter to handle this : es.indexer.id.random. The getDocumentId() can also be overrided to create any ID with metadata.

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Bret mikwiss00@gmail.com

Thanks for contributing to StormCrawler, your efforts are appreciated!

Developer Certificate of Origin

By contributing to StormCrawler, you accept and agree to the following terms and conditions (the Developer Certificate of Origin) for your present and future contributions submitted to StormCrawler.
Please refer to the Developer Certificate of Origin section in CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

Developer Certificate of Origin
Version 1.1

Copyright (C) 2004, 2006 The Linux Foundation and its contributors.
1 Letterman Drive
Suite D4700
San Francisco, CA, 94129

Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies of this
license document, but changing it is not allowed.


Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.1

By making a contribution to this project, I certify that:

(a) The contribution was created in whole or in part by me and I
    have the right to submit it under the open source license
    indicated in the file; or

(b) The contribution is based upon previous work that, to the best
    of my knowledge, is covered under an appropriate open source
    license and I have the right under that license to submit that
    work with modifications, whether created in whole or in part
    by me, under the same open source license (unless I am
    permitted to submit under a different license), as indicated
    in the file; or

(c) The contribution was provided directly to me by some other
    person who certified (a), (b) or (c) and I have not modified
    it.

(d) I understand and agree that this project and the contribution
    are public and that a record of the contribution (including all
    personal information I submit with it, including my sign-off) is
    maintained indefinitely and may be redistributed consistent with
    this project or the open source license(s) involved.

Before opening a PR, please check that:

  • You've squashed your commits into a single one
  • You've described what the PR does or at least point to a related issue
  • You've signed-ff your commits with 'git commit -s'
  • The code is properly formatted with 'mvn git-code-format:format-code -Dgcf.globPattern=**/*'

Thanks!

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Bret <mikwiss00@gmail.com>
@rzo1
Copy link
Contributor

rzo1 commented Jan 5, 2023

I am wondering, if it would be enough to provide

 protected String getDocumentID(Metadata metadata, String normalisedUrl) {
//Return current default
}

so user's can override as needed without introducing a new config option?

@Mikwiss
Copy link
Contributor Author

Mikwiss commented Jan 5, 2023

It's enough indeed ! Maybe I am the only one to want keep data :)

@jnioche
Copy link
Contributor

jnioche commented Jan 6, 2023 via email

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Bret <mikwiss00@gmail.com>
@jnioche
Copy link
Contributor

jnioche commented Jan 7, 2023

We'll need this for the other modules (SOLR, OpenSearch etc...) so I'd rather we did it for all of them in one go.
The new method could go in AbstractIndexerBolt with the default implementation there, then call it in each implementation.

@rzo1
Copy link
Contributor

rzo1 commented Jan 8, 2023

We'll need this for the other modules (SOLR, OpenSearch etc...) so I'd rather we did it for all of them in one go.
The new method could go in AbstractIndexerBolt with the default implementation there, then call it in each implementation.

+1

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Bret <mikwiss00@gmail.com>
@Mikwiss
Copy link
Contributor Author

Mikwiss commented Jan 10, 2023

Hi guys,

I made the change, but I'm not sure about solr and sql (despite changes don't change the behavior).

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Bret <mikwiss00@gmail.com>
@jnioche jnioche merged commit 9bc2be9 into apache:master Jan 10, 2023
@jnioche
Copy link
Contributor

jnioche commented Jan 10, 2023

thanks @Mikwiss!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants