Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

getWebApiKey no longer functional -> GetTradeOffers & other api-key based stuff is broken #354

Open
kjljxybr opened this issue May 2, 2024 · 6 comments

Comments

@kjljxybr
Copy link

kjljxybr commented May 2, 2024

Since getWebApiKey gives zeros, polling stopped working. How to reproduce:
You're getting cookies somehow -> you're using manager.setCookies() -> manager sets cookies for steamcommunity -> manager tries to get api key from steam -> manager receives zeros -> manager polling is broken

CleanShot 2024-05-02 at 16 27 47@2x
CleanShot 2024-05-02 at 16 28 03@2x

@kjljxybr
Copy link
Author

kjljxybr commented May 2, 2024

DoctorMcKay/node-steamcommunity#342 is related to this issue

@kjljxybr
Copy link
Author

kjljxybr commented May 2, 2024

workaround: set api-key just before you set cookies
CleanShot 2024-05-02 at 16 49 40@2x

@kjljxybr
Copy link
Author

kjljxybr commented May 6, 2024

workaround №2:
CleanShot 2024-05-06 at 19 50 20@2x

@Jeramy499k
Copy link

workaround №2: CleanShot 2024-05-06 at 19 50 20@2x

THanks it's work after get 429/403 for few days

@DoctorMcKay
Copy link
Owner

I still haven't seen this behavior on any of my accounts.

image

@ikolka
Copy link

ikolka commented May 10, 2024

Neither option works for me. If I don't use 'UseAccessToken: true' when creating the manager, I get a 429 error in trades. If I use 'UseAccessToken', there are no errors, but trades aren't accepted, even though I receive information about them. Also, when trying to create an API key, I somehow received a 429 error from Steam

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants