-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 480
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Create resources based on open source survery #427
Comments
@orange-buffalo ; views? |
CLABot or cla-assistant |
My view is to keep it simple. Dozer is not under Apache or other legal entity, so generally speaking no one cares about license agreements. It will just increase the barrier to entry for those willing to contribute. Contributing guide is a must. I made a placeholder some time ago https://github.com/DozerMapper/dozer/wiki/Contributing-to-Dozer |
I agree with @buzdin that having CLA would complicate contribution process, especially for new members. I believe that it would be enough to have a short statement in contribution guide in this regard, something like "By contributing to Dozer project you agree that you contribution is managed and distributed in compliance with Dozer license" (or any fancier expression if you familiar with more formal legal statements :) ). As for code of conduct, I don't mind having it in the project. But to me this is something more typical for big companies / huge projects with lots of contributors. Again, having a statement in contribution guide like "Please respect others and be polite" would be quite sufficient. I suggest to move the contribution guide from wiki to the |
Am happy with what you've both said. Am just throwing ideas out there :) |
The following survey suggests we should add a few "admin" style info:
https://github.com/blog/2372-announcing-the-open-source-survey
contributing guide
[/] code of conduct
[/] contributor license agreement
1/2 are just docs, 3 can be done via a github bot.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: