Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FeatureRequest]: Buffering Commands Safety Concerns #537

Open
EducatingSavvas opened this issue Aug 9, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

[FeatureRequest]: Buffering Commands Safety Concerns #537

EducatingSavvas opened this issue Aug 9, 2021 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement Additional functionality, performance or other feature request

Comments

@EducatingSavvas
Copy link

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

Hiya - This is something I've mentioned before but I'd like to request non buffering commands for future firmware versions. That is to say when one macro or movement is being executed the web interface and paneldue should not accept additional instructions until the last one has completed. This is for safety reasons and particularly a problem with CNC routers / and larger 3D printers. It's very easy to accidently press a movement button or macro twice and while soft limits might prevent crashing - material / limbs can get caught between moving parts.

Describe the solution you propose.

Option to disable buffering of commands from web interface and panel due.

Describe alternatives you've considered

The issue was partly addressed in this post: https://forum.duet3d.com/topic/23333/alternative-axis-movement-speed-control/5?_=1626259464707 by JoeSmale - with their pendant being able to turn buffering off. I still think this option needs to be available in the web interface.

Provide any additional context or information.

Ex. Photos, mockups, etc.

@T3P3 T3P3 assigned dc42 and unassigned x0rtrunks May 4, 2023
@T3P3 T3P3 added the enhancement Additional functionality, performance or other feature request label May 4, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement Additional functionality, performance or other feature request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants