Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Multi route planning #4

Open
iller75 opened this issue Feb 13, 2015 · 6 comments
Open

Multi route planning #4

iller75 opened this issue Feb 13, 2015 · 6 comments

Comments

@iller75
Copy link

iller75 commented Feb 13, 2015

Since the new changes in trading it's sometimes better to have a route that is more than a jump between 2 systems to trade with. So ad so that it checks for the best route between up to 4 stations/systems in a route.

@Duke-Jones
Copy link
Owner

see also #21 (duplicate)

@iller75
Copy link
Author

iller75 commented Jun 1, 2015

Any idea when this might be implemented? I think it should be a pretty high priority as it would up your cr/t by quite a lot.

@Duke-Jones
Copy link
Owner

It's not so easy to answer. Before such and a functionality (and other nice)
can implemented, the internal data structure must completely
revised. At the moment it's inefficient and fragmented but
I already started the modification - but it needs much more time
(and last but not least: and the summer is coming, too)

So I ' sorry, but I can't get you a real answer - I only can say "it's in progress" ;-)

@iller75
Copy link
Author

iller75 commented Jun 2, 2015

hehe ok, keep up the good work :)

@iller75
Copy link
Author

iller75 commented Jul 9, 2015

How is this coming along? I find myself using this less and less due to this feature being missing, i sadly use thrudds and eddb more and more but i want to use this.

@Duke-Jones
Copy link
Owner

the absolute focus is at the moment the restructuring with sql.
It makes no sense to implement such complex features in the current structure.
If the reconstruction with sql is done (but I can't name a eta at the moment)
I may can implement it,
sorry for this

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants