Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug : wrong URL for timer added from EPG results in no recording #1004

Closed
telemach1337 opened this issue May 7, 2020 · 6 comments
Closed

Comments

@telemach1337
Copy link

telemach1337 commented May 7, 2020

Tuner : RedEagle TwinBox LCD
FW : OpenHDF 6.4 #137
OW : 1.3.9

Using E2m3u2bouquet I add my m3u and source EPG and using EPGimporter I load this source (http://epg.ovh/pl.xml).

  • if I add timer manually or from EPG using remote it works and records
  • if I add timer manually from OpenWebif using 'add timer' it works and records

timers.xml has this

  • if use OpenWebif and select from EPG certain program and then I click on icon 'add timer' then it adds new timer position but different than others

so it records but file is empty because of %253a instead of %3 in URL

second issue shows in Timers in Enigma2 menu when entered from remote on TV

https://i.imgur.com/S92YYo3.jpg

timer added using 'add timer' has Stream as source and timer added using EPG has 0.0E

@jbleyel
Copy link
Contributor

jbleyel commented May 7, 2020

Please do these steps.

Create a not working timer using openwebif.
Provide the part of the timer.xml of this new timer here.
Delete this timer and create the exact timer using the box OSD and provide the timer.xml again.

I need the differences of the timer.xml

@telemach1337
Copy link
Author

OK I will do that but have to find a way to proper insert because I did before and the code was deleted by github

@jbleyel
Copy link
Contributor

jbleyel commented May 7, 2020

you can make a screenshot or make a txt file

@telemach1337
Copy link
Author

Here you see the difference

https://0paste.com/66707

@rdamas
Copy link
Contributor

rdamas commented May 7, 2020

Looks like a double encoded percent sign: %253a vs %3a (%25 is the "%" sign)

@telemach1337
Copy link
Author

Looks like a double encoded percent sign: %253a vs %3a (%25 is the "%" sign)

that's exactly what I wrote in the first post

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants