New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
is the THRAWS dataset really RAW S2 images ? #25
Comments
Hi François, |
Hi François, I'm sorry for not getting back to you sooner, but we completely missed this issue. In addition to Roberto's response, please notice that our Raw data are decompressed L0 + additional metadata files generated at ground-segment level. As fully disclosed here, the main difference with respect to the original raw data is the effect of onboard equalization and information loss due to compression. Concerning onboard calibration (gain corrections, removal of dark signals, etc.), this happens periodically when Sentinel-2 is in eclipse at the North Pole, so it is not an additional operation in the data processing chain: https://sentinel.esa.int/documents/247904/2047089/Sentinel-2_Cal-Val_Phase-E2 So, we provide the closest data to the original "raw" data you can get without interfering with the normal satellite concept of operations. |
Hi Gabriele and thank you for the response. As I understand from your answear compression algorithms are applied on board on equalized images (PRNU+DSNU) without absolute calibration coefficient. Regards, |
Hi François, The algorithm to perform the equalization is described here: https://sentinel.esa.int/documents/247904/2047089/Sentinel-2_Cal-Val_Phase-E2. Unfortunately, currently we do not have access to the equalization coefficients needed to revert the process. Regards, Gabriele |
Hello guys,
I have downloaded the THRAWS dataset to play with but I have found that the so called "L0" are the images that have been
corrected of dark signal non uniforminy and probably corrected of the pixel responses non uniformity ...
The "Raws" here is more about the product being not band registered and reprojected, right ?
Do you plan to realease the real RAWS data at some point ?
Regards,
François
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: