Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

How should physics scheme tendencies be accumulated over the timestep? #12

Open
nusbaume opened this issue Mar 10, 2020 · 0 comments
Open
Labels
discussion Something needs to be discussed among the group.

Comments

@nusbaume
Copy link
Collaborator

As pointed out by @gold2718 in pull request #7 , it is currently unclear how changes in, say, tracer quantities should be gathered or accumulated from each physics scheme and then passed on to the dycore. There are currently three options on the table (although feel free to add more):

  • Keep the current scheme (i.e., only track updated quantities)

  • Move to accumulating tendencies (for passing back to the dycore)

  • Have CAM accumulate the type of tracer feedback required by the dycore (e.g., updated quantity for FV, tendency for SE).

A decision needs to be made at some point, but for now this issue purely exists as reminder to discuss the different possibilities. Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
discussion Something needs to be discussed among the group.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant