Criteria #9, #10, #11 and #24 have an unnecessary text field

[sakispantazis]

Criteria 9, 10, 11 (i.e. the question asking if the economic operator has to its knowledge, breached its obligations in the fields of environmental, social and labour law) and criterion 24 (i.e. the question asking if the purely national grounds of exclusion, which are specified in the relevant notice or in the procurement documents are applied)

The Regulation’s stipulations for these criteria are:

Criteria 9, 10, 11

Criterion 24

In the current implementation of the ESPD taxonomy/structure and in case of a positive answer an unnecessary text field appears before the next yes/no sub-question/criterion.

[mireiaBM]

This issue will be addressed in version 3.0.0 of the ESPD data model.

[JosePRevenga]

Indeed, it has been agreed that in v3.0.0 the row containing the question "Please, describe them" (e.g. Criterion 9, row number 8 of the Basic model) shall be removed from the EDM data structure. This would also be the case for the purely National criteria in the Basic model (but not in the Extended).

[hricolor]

After the discussion of the issue in the OUC (Wednesday 17 of June), the solution to the issue will be the removal of the unnecessary question that appears in case of a positive answer.

This issue will be fixed in the new version of ESPD.