You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
During the development of SEMIC we have found that in Criterion 30 of both Basic and Extended taxonomies the QUESTION/REQUIREMENT “Number of fiscal years” data types were changed to QUANTITY_INTEGER from AMOUNT in the latest ESPD version. While this change is much a better fit for it, we would like to propose to refine even more the data type by using QUANTITY_YEAR, that is already present in ESPD’s CL.
The QUESTION_GROUP/REQUIREMENT_GROUP we are referring to are:
Basic: e1886054-ada4-473c-9afc-2fde82c24cf4
Extended: 53882893-f4a8-40ae-99dc-cad7b0748790
Please note that in the latter, the REQUIREMENT_GROUP is wrongly closed, as cardinality, UUID and ElementCode are present at element closure, but the closing bracket “}” is missing:
We hope you find these remarks useful.
Kind regards,
SEMIC team
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
After carrying out the analysis and present in the OUC meeting (Wednesday 17 of June), for this issue the PropertyDataType will be changed from QUANTITY_INTEGER to QUANTITY_YEAR, to better represent the content expected for "Number of fiscal years". Also, the errors found in the Criteria Taxonomy will be corrected.
This issue will be fixed in the new version of ESPD.
Dear ESPD team,
During the development of SEMIC we have found that in Criterion 30 of both Basic and Extended taxonomies the QUESTION/REQUIREMENT “Number of fiscal years” data types were changed to QUANTITY_INTEGER from AMOUNT in the latest ESPD version. While this change is much a better fit for it, we would like to propose to refine even more the data type by using QUANTITY_YEAR, that is already present in ESPD’s CL.
The QUESTION_GROUP/REQUIREMENT_GROUP we are referring to are:
Please note that in the latter, the REQUIREMENT_GROUP is wrongly closed, as cardinality, UUID and ElementCode are present at element closure, but the closing bracket “}” is missing:
We hope you find these remarks useful.
Kind regards,
SEMIC team
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: