Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make sure new features are compatible with linking to a common settings file. #24

Open
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Jan 12, 2016 · 4 comments

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link

This is really just a note to me so I don't forget!
-Are the new backup/buttons/etc features compatible with settings file in 
common directory.
- Previously we could have PicasaStarter on local drive, using settings etc. on 
Network drive. This avoided the UAC prompt when running from network drive. Is 
this still possible?

Original issue reported on code.google.com by earlb...@gmail.com on 3 Nov 2011 at 7:34

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

So far all features allow settings file to be in another directory.
This is important because we may want a local copy of PicasaStarter to access a 
network settings file, so the user doesn't get a UAC every time he starts PS on 
the network drive.

Original comment by earlb...@gmail.com on 2 Dec 2011 at 3:33

  • Changed state: Started
  • Added labels: Milestone-Release2.0.0

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

[deleted comment]

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

We have been making sure the new functions still work with the settings file in 
a different location from the PS exe file, and so far everything is compatible.
Leaving the status as started for now just to ensure it isn't forgotten

Original comment by earlb...@gmail.com on 16 Feb 2012 at 8:06

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

All testing on Win7 and WinXP English, German, and French, and on Local, NAS, 
Shared drives shows compatibility.

Original comment by earlb...@gmail.com on 20 Mar 2012 at 2:09

  • Changed state: Implemented

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant