You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When reading the code, I can see you use dice_coef for the performance metric. But I am not very clear why you need to setup dice_loss as -dice_coef.
Is that because the higher dice_coef is, the better is performance. As a result, you try to minimize its opposite, dice_loss. Is my understanding correct?
Secondly, why you setup IMG_ROWS, IMG_COLS = 80, 112. It seems to me the training set has rows=480,and cols=520.
Thanks,
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi Edward,
When reading the code, I can see you use dice_coef for the performance metric. But I am not very clear why you need to setup dice_loss as -dice_coef.
Is that because the higher dice_coef is, the better is performance. As a result, you try to minimize its opposite, dice_loss. Is my understanding correct?
Secondly, why you setup IMG_ROWS, IMG_COLS = 80, 112. It seems to me the training set has rows=480,and cols=520.
Thanks,
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: