Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Move functionality of ksLookup(..., KDB_O_POP) to a new function ksRemoveKey #3979

Closed
Tracked by #4568
lawli3t opened this issue Jul 31, 2021 · 7 comments
Closed
Tracked by #4568

Move functionality of ksLookup(..., KDB_O_POP) to a new function ksRemoveKey #3979

lawli3t opened this issue Jul 31, 2021 · 7 comments
Labels
stale

Comments

@lawli3t
Copy link
Contributor

lawli3t commented Jul 31, 2021

No description provided.

@tucek tucek added this to Stage in Java bindings overhaul via automation Aug 1, 2021
@tucek tucek moved this from Stage to blocked / waiting on in Java bindings overhaul Aug 1, 2021
@markus2330
Copy link
Contributor

It doesn't need to be a move, it could be an alias.

@markus2330
Copy link
Contributor

@tucek you can immediately offer something like this in the Java API, the aliases are not useful for the bindings anyway.

@tucek
Copy link
Contributor

tucek commented Aug 5, 2021

@tucek you can immediately offer something like this in the Java API, the aliases are not useful for the bindings anyway.

@markus2330 please have a look at the newly created corresponding issue #3982 - i could include that with PR #3790

@tucek tucek removed this from blocked / waiting on in Java bindings overhaul Aug 6, 2021
@lawli3t lawli3t mentioned this issue Oct 10, 2021
Closed
20 tasks
@kodebach kodebach mentioned this issue Jan 6, 2022
Closed
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Aug 11, 2022

I mark this issue stale as it did not have any activity for one year. I'll close it in two weeks if no further activity occurs. If you want it to be alive again, ping the issue by writing a message here or create a new issue with the remainder of this issue.
Thank you for your contributions 💖

@stale stale bot added the stale label Aug 11, 2022
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Sep 9, 2022

I closed this issue now because it has been inactive for more than one year. If I closed it by mistake, please do not hesitate to reopen it or create a new issue with the remainder of this issue.
Thank you for your contributions 💖

@stale stale bot closed this as completed Sep 9, 2022
@kodebach kodebach reopened this Sep 9, 2022
@stale stale bot removed the stale label Sep 9, 2022
@kodebach kodebach mentioned this issue Oct 18, 2022
Open
11 tasks
@github-actions
Copy link

I mark this stale as it did not have any activity for one year. I'll close it in two weeks if no further activity occurs. If you want it to be alive again, ping by writing a message here or create a new issue with the remainder of this issue.
Thank you for your contributions 💖

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Sep 10, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link

I closed this now because it has been inactive for more than one year. If I closed it by mistake, please do not hesitate to reopen it or create a new issue with the remainder of this issue.
Thank you for your contributions 💖

@github-actions github-actions bot closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Sep 24, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
stale
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

add ksRemoveKey alias for keyLookup(..., KDB_O_POP) lawli3t/libelektra
4 participants
@lawli3t @markus2330 @tucek @kodebach