Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

How is MachineConsumer's cycle duration taken into account ? #7

Open
Jaxom99 opened this issue Feb 27, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

How is MachineConsumer's cycle duration taken into account ? #7

Jaxom99 opened this issue Feb 27, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation to be done

Comments

@Jaxom99
Copy link
Member

Jaxom99 commented Feb 27, 2024

As expressed by the title: users don't see that the EMS planning include the duration they declare. As such, longer cycles can lead to end-time constraint overshoot, disconforting the user.

As a proposed "easy way" : the recorded cycle in the form of an array could be enlarged (with values of 0, or median consumption) or reduced (cutting last values?) to match the declared next cycle duration.

@Jaxom99 Jaxom99 added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation to be done labels Feb 27, 2024
@Jaxom99
Copy link
Member Author

Jaxom99 commented Feb 27, 2024

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation to be done
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant