You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Some plantuml code only has statements between UML classes like this
LiteralExp<|--TemplateExp
The left-right members of the association are not explicitly stated as classes using the class keyword. It would be nice if the parsed json result from this tool treats this as an implicitly defined class. The json should have a class entry like this, in addition to the left-right entry.
If I understand you correct, you would like the parser to infer the existence of a class (LiteralExp) because of the simple fact that there exists a relationship between LiteralExp and TemplateExp. Thinking about it, this is a bit much logic for a parser and not really something I would like to implement in the core.
But you could implement this functionality yourself in a custom formatter.
Leaving this open for now, maybe I misunderstood you.
Some plantuml code only has statements between UML classes like this
The left-right members of the association are not explicitly stated as classes using the
class
keyword. It would be nice if the parsed json result from this tool treats this as an implicitly defined class. The json should have a class entry like this, in addition to the left-right entry.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: