Calcite tabs interfering with other calcite elements```

[sam11927]

Actual Behavior

We have a set of calcite tabs and one of the tabs contains an accordion with expanded set to true on the initial render, however, sometimes when opening the tabs in a calcite-panel, the expand/collapse button on the accordion does not work and an error is seen in the console.

Expected Behavior

Expandable button should work on accordion within a tab within a panel/shell

Reproduction Sample

NA

Reproduction Steps

1. have a shell
2. have tabs inside the shell
3. have accordion inside a tab
4. open the shell
5. notice expand button does not work and console error is seen
   (had some issues reproducing in a codepen, feel free to reach out to me and I can provide more info if this is not sufficient)

Reproduction Version

next

Relevant Info

constructor(e) {
        t(this, e),
        this.calciteTabChange = i(this, "calciteTabChange", 6),
        this.calciteInternalTabChange = i(this, "calciteInternalTabChange", 6),
        this.animationActiveDuration = .3,
        this.resizeObserver = b("resize", (()=>{
            this.activeIndicatorEl.style.transitionDuration = "0s",
            this.updateActiveWidth(),
            this.updateOffsetPosition()
        }

TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'style')
activeIndicatorEl is undefined I think

Regression?

No response

Impact

This is part of our apps core workflow

Esri team

ArcGIS Online

[github-actions]

It looks like this issue is missing some information:

• A codepen, codesandbox, or jsbin that reproduces the issue. Alternatively, a documentation sample can be used if the issue is reproducible. If you are experiencing build or Node related errors, please provide a GitHub repo for the sample.

Issues without reproduction samples may not be prioritized. If you were unable to create a sample, please try to answer any questions that arise once development begins. Thanks for your understanding.

[macandcheese]

Related - #6310

[geospatialem]

@sam11927 We had a fix for the 6310 issue Adam referenced above in 1.0.4-next.4. Can you verify if the fix applies to the use case mentioned above?

[github-actions]

Installed and assigned for verification.

[sam11927]

@sam11927 We had a fix for the 6310 issue Adam referenced above in 1.0.4-next.4. Can you verify if the fix applies to the use case mentioned above?

Yep looks good on that version

[geospatialem]

Awesome, thanks for verifying! Will close out the issue.