Unfused riser tap

[MikeMillerGIS]

In discussion what to do with Risers, we need to sketch up.

We are currently discussing removing the riser junction. This would info would be moved to an attribute on a pole.

[MikeMillerGIS]

https://github.com/ArcGIS/utility-network-configurations/issues/1006

[MikeMillerGIS]

@jalsup will provide a whiteboard drawing

[MikeMillerGIS]

Here is what we sketched, related to
https://github.com/ArcGIS/utility-network-configurations/issues/1010

[MichaelZeiler]

Am I understanding this correctly?
Also, a realistic example would have fuses and maybe arresters here

[MikeMillerGIS]

@jalsup does that sum up what we discussed?

[jalsup]

This is completely valid and very common. In the south east we typically place a fuse and arrester. Out West, maybe just a fuse, but in all locations, the fuse is only used if there are many pieces of equipment served by this line. This would be a case where one transformer is connected to the underground line. I will find some examples for you in PNM's data. Also, we want to start with a simple case that clearly shows the need for the multiple taps and offsetting the underground line from the overhead (not spatially coincident) with out the detraction of other equipment.

[MichaelZeiler]

Ok, I extended this to the simplest realistic example.

[MichaelZeiler]

@jalsup am I getting the attachment pattern right? That there are attachment associations from the attachment junction to the pole and the line fuse assembly to the pole?

[jalsup]

get ride of the fuses or save them for another drawing. This needs to not have the fuses.

[jalsup]

in this case, there is no assembly.

[MikeMillerGIS]

Focus this effort on the unfused Riser tap. In the same folder(Riser Tap), we can add the other variations, will create issues for them

[MichaelZeiler]

#142

[MichaelZeiler]