Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Optional Features "Failing" #145

Closed
SUBnet192 opened this issue Nov 28, 2021 · 6 comments
Closed

Optional Features "Failing" #145

SUBnet192 opened this issue Nov 28, 2021 · 6 comments

Comments

@SUBnet192
Copy link
Contributor

image

Since these are optional features, I would mark them informational/Optional, not failed. Especially PAM, since I haven't encountered a single environment that uses it (so far).
@SUBnet192
Copy link
Contributor Author

SUBnet192 commented Nov 28, 2021 •
edited
Loading

The other two, personally, I would not mark them as optional nowadays. They should be enabled for everyone :D

@PrzemyslawKlys
Copy link
Member

PAM has to be enabled if you use Lithnet Access Manager (highly recommended).

@SUBnet192
Copy link
Contributor Author

SUBnet192 commented Nov 28, 2021 •
edited
Loading

PAM has to be enabled if you use Lithnet Access Manager (highly recommended).

Possible, never used it with all settings (Only for LAPS web front end). However, I still would't "FAIL" a test for an Optional feature. Thanks for all your hard work. I'm testing your updates/changes, so far so good.

@PrzemyslawKlys
Copy link
Member

In HTML it has different values. I need to rewrite the console portion to make sure it shows the same thing not just true/false

@SUBnet192
Copy link
Contributor Author

image

HTML also shows wrong information in diagram.

@PrzemyslawKlys
Copy link
Member

Fixed in new version

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@SUBnet192 @PrzemyslawKlys