Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

serializing nested ntbk metadata items #147

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 8, 2020
Merged

serializing nested ntbk metadata items #147

merged 2 commits into from
Apr 8, 2020

Conversation

choldgraf
Copy link
Member

@choldgraf choldgraf commented Apr 8, 2020

I think that this is the only thing that we need to do in order to get nested metadata working.

edit: I think I need to edit some of the tests because the metadata in the output document will be different...I will try and figure out to update the regressions stuff so that it works (though somebody comment if that's not the problem here). @chrisjsewell are we OK with just updating the regression templates so that they now include the JSON-serialized nested metadata?

closes #147

@chrisjsewell
Copy link
Member

Yep the failed tests show that the metadata is being correctly propagated to the sphinx env, you just need to update them!

@choldgraf
Copy link
Member Author

OK I think I've got it fixed (in a fairly inelegant way, but 🤷‍♂ ). I had to update the pre-commit flake8 test because the nested JSON lines are too long, but other than that tests were passing

"ipub": '{"bibliography": "example.bib", "biboptions": ["super", "sort"], "bibstyle": "unsrtnat", "language": "portuges", "listcode": true, "listfigures": true, "listtables": true, "titlepage": {"author": "Authors Name", "email": "authors@email.com", "institution": ["Institution1", "Institution2"], "logo": "logo_example.png", "subtitle": "Sub-Title", "supervisors": ["First Supervisor", "Second Supervisor"], "tagline": "A tagline for the report.", "title": "Main-Title"}, "toc": {"depth": 2}, "pandoc": {"use_numref": true, "at_notation": true}, "sphinx": {"bib_title": "My Bibliography"}}',
"jupytext": '{"metadata_filter": {"notebook": "ipub"}}',
"kernelspec": '{"display_name": "Python 3", "language": "python", "name": "python3"}',
"language_info": '{"codemirror_mode": {"name": "ipython", "version": 3}, "file_extension": ".py", "mimetype": "text/x-python", "name": "python", "nbconvert_exporter": "python", "pygments_lexer": "ipython3", "version": "3.6.2"}',
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@chrisjsewell is there any reason for us to think any of this stuff will be brittle and break over time? (e.g. as libraries update etc?)

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ugh I think the answer is yes, because the tests are erroring because the version of jupytext they've got is different from the one on my machine. hmmmmm

Comment on lines 10 to 11
tests/test_parser.py|
tests/test_text_based.py
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Lazy 😜 ! Add # noqa: E501 to specific lines that are too long, not ignore the whole file

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ahhh that's right, I knew there was a way to do that

@@ -23,7 +29,18 @@ def test_complex_outputs(sphinx_run, file_regression):
# print(sphinx_run.status())
assert sphinx_run.warnings() == ""
assert sphinx_run.app.env.metadata == {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

as this is pretty long now, probably easier to add a data_regression.check

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

same with the others

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok this is a good opportunity to learn about data_regression.check. I guess that we will just have to update the regression templates any time that the jupytext version is updated

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeh, or if it's going to change to often, just do as a minimum assert set(sphinx_run.app.env.metadata.keys()) == {"celltoolbar", ...}

@choldgraf
Copy link
Member Author

choldgraf commented Apr 8, 2020

@chrisjsewell where does the jupytext dependency get defined? I didn't see it in there, but I think it's needed for myst text reading, no? Are we inheriting it from some other package? And if so then should I just add it in explicitly?

edit: oh weird, we're not using jupytext in the parsing, but the file metadata is still different somehow...

I am thinking this might be more sensible if we just check to make sure the keys are always the same, as well as the values of a few select keys

@chrisjsewell
Copy link
Member

where does the jupytext dependency get defined? I didn't see it in there, but I think it's needed for myst text reading, no? Are we inheriting it from some other package? And if so then should I just add it in explicitly?

There's (at least currently) no specific dependency of myst-nb or jupytext, since the relevant code from jupytext is essentially copied into myst_nb/convert. It's an open question if, now that jupytext 1.4.2 is released, we delete this code and import from jupytext.

The versions you see in the notebook/myst-markdown metadata, are/were generated during jupytext --to myst notebook.ipynb or when you pair the notebook in jupyter notebook/lab.
They don't change dynamically and are not strictly required for reading in the current code (jupytext uses them to checks for compatible versions: https://github.com/mwouts/jupytext/blob/b8693695640efa0659d91ab6f5a2524ca9f75471/jupytext/formats.py#L365). So yeh they are static and won't change if dependencies change

@choldgraf
Copy link
Member Author

OK take a look at the latest testing suite. I'm checking for all the keys in the metadata, as well as for the proper values for a few keys, including both "flat" and "nested" values. Think that works?

assert sphinx_run.app.env.metadata["basic_run"]["test_name"] == "notebook1"
assert (
sphinx_run.app.env.metadata["basic_run"]["kernelspec"]
== '{"display_name": "Python 3", "language": "python", "name": "python3"}'
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

note - black did this, and it seemed reasonable + removed the line too long issues, so I went with it

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 8, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #147 into master will not change coverage by %.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #147   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   83.85%   83.85%           
=======================================
  Files           9        9           
  Lines         805      805           
=======================================
  Hits          675      675           
  Misses        130      130           
Flag Coverage Δ
#pytests 83.85% <ø> (ø)
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
myst_nb/parser.py 91.15% <ø> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update e77e33c...c75beb1. Read the comment docs.

@choldgraf
Copy link
Member Author

choldgraf commented Apr 8, 2020

finally

image

@chrisjsewell
Copy link
Member

Yep looks fine to me 👍

@choldgraf choldgraf merged commit 4d57fd8 into master Apr 8, 2020
@choldgraf choldgraf deleted the ntbk_metadata branch April 8, 2020 23:54
@chrisjsewell
Copy link
Member

I don't think you realize how easy you have it here lol. For example, I just has this PR merged aiidateam/aiida-core#3613 after months of having to address revisions from 3 reviewers and a lot more stringent CI checks 😬

@choldgraf
Copy link
Member Author

choldgraf commented Apr 9, 2020

haha - my worst was in switching over the matplotlib documentation entirely to use sphinx-gallery. It took 7 months and more bikeshedding than I have ever experienced in my life :-) I also had this MNE-python PR that had 268 comments over 3 months before it finally got merged.

phaustin pushed a commit to phaustin/MyST-NB that referenced this pull request Apr 10, 2020
* serializing nested ntbk metadata items
* updating tests for nested metadata
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants