Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create a Simpler Dalvik Parser #4

Closed
Fare9 opened this issue Dec 6, 2023 · 1 comment · Fixed by #10
Closed

Create a Simpler Dalvik Parser #4

Fare9 opened this issue Dec 6, 2023 · 1 comment · Fixed by #10
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed
Milestone

Comments

@Fare9
Copy link
Owner

Fare9 commented Dec 6, 2023

Create a new Dalvik Parser on its corresponding folder. In Kunai, the parser became a little difficult when it comes to the Annotations part because there were many nested lists. A super class could be created in order to create sub-classes for the different annotations. The parser should provide ranges for accessing the data since it would provide a safe way for accessing data.
Next you can find the Parser from Kunai: https://github.com/Fare9/KUNAI-static-analyzer/tree/refactoring/kunai-lib/include/Kunai/DEX/parser

This issue can be used for design discussion.

@Fare9 Fare9 added enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed labels Dec 6, 2023
@Fare9 Fare9 added this to the Dex Analyzer milestone Dec 6, 2023
@Fare9 Fare9 self-assigned this Dec 19, 2023
@Fare9
Copy link
Owner Author

Fare9 commented Dec 19, 2023

Maybe @jeppojeps you could help to improve the CMake code, make it easier to read and maybe more structured.

@Fare9 Fare9 linked a pull request Dec 29, 2023 that will close this issue
@Fare9 Fare9 closed this as completed in #10 Jan 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant