Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

jackson-parent don't include the license file #1

Closed
puntogil opened this issue Jul 3, 2014 · 1 comment
Closed

jackson-parent don't include the license file #1

puntogil opened this issue Jul 3, 2014 · 1 comment

Comments

@puntogil
Copy link

puntogil commented Jul 3, 2014

Not available LICENSE file in source directory structure
Please. Added license and copyright notice.
the fedora pakaging guideline is very strictly precise about this problem
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines?rd=Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text
thanks
regards

@cowtowncoder
Copy link
Member

This project does not produce artifacts and is only used for building, so I don't quite follow what the reported issue is. Pom.xml itself does include licensing information; existence of file is never a requirement, although some people seem to have strong preference for adding files.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants