You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you for developing ExploreATE, it runs fast and is convenient to use.
I have a question regarding quant.sf result.
I am a little confused about how the EffectiveLength column is calculated. Sometimes it is longer than the Length value like this one.
scaffold_713:152931:160869:TE_00001149_INT/LTR/Gypsy | 7938 | 10780.234 | 9.701402e+01 | 2342.334
and this one has very short effective length when both TPM and NumReads are high scaffold_3:37484:37651:TE_00001309_INT/LTR/unknown | 167 | 8.000 | 6.620188e+04 | 1186.168
Could you clarify how the effective length is calculated? Do you recommend filtering the result based on effective length to identify the true transcription of TEs?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Dear ExploreATE developer,
Thank you for developing ExploreATE, it runs fast and is convenient to use.
I have a question regarding quant.sf result.
I am a little confused about how the EffectiveLength column is calculated. Sometimes it is longer than the Length value like this one.
scaffold_713:152931:160869:TE_00001149_INT/LTR/Gypsy | 7938 | 10780.234 | 9.701402e+01 | 2342.334
and this one has very short effective length when both TPM and NumReads are high
scaffold_3:37484:37651:TE_00001309_INT/LTR/unknown | 167 | 8.000 | 6.620188e+04 | 1186.168
Could you clarify how the effective length is calculated? Do you recommend filtering the result based on effective length to identify the true transcription of TEs?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: