Adds change-array-by-copy polyfills

[mhassan1]

This PR adds the following ES2023 polyfills:

• Array.prototype.toReversed
• Array.prototype.toSorted
• Array.prototype.toSpliced
• Array.prototype.with
• %TypedArray%.prototype.toReversed
• %TypedArray%.prototype.toSorted
• %TypedArray%.prototype.with

[romainmenke]

/ok-to-test sha=cf9230b

[romainmenke]

CI running here: https://github.com/Financial-Times/polyfill-library/actions/runs/4724256232

CI is likely still broken, but maybe it also has useful feedback :)

[romainmenke]

/ok-to-test sha=cab69e6

https://github.com/Financial-Times/polyfill-library/actions/runs/4762911502

[mhassan1]

https://github.com/Financial-Times/polyfill-library/actions/runs/4762911502

There are a bunch of failures:

• F must be a constructor: The ArrayBuffer polyfill does not expose int8Array.constructor.name
• With == with: Missing dependency on Function.prototype.name
• A.sort is not a function: The ArrayBuffer polyfill includes TypedArray.prototype.sort, but we don't deliver ArrayBuffer to browsers that have TypedArray but don't have TypedArray.prototype.sort (e.g. Chrome 44)
• [TypedArray].prototype.sort: argument is not a Function object: We should not pass undefined to sort

All of these have been fixed except A.sort is not a function, which may require some discussion. I think we have a few options:

1. Deliver the ArrayBuffer polyfill to versions that do not have TypedArray.prototype.sort
2. Write a separate TypedArray.prototype.sort polyfill
3. Implement TypedArray.prototype.sort inside TypedArray.prototype.toSorted

[JakeChampion]

Financial-Times/polyfill-library/actions/runs/4762911502

There are a bunch of failures:

* `F must be a constructor`: The `ArrayBuffer` polyfill does not expose `int8Array.constructor.name`

* `With == with`: Missing dependency on `Function.prototype.name`

* `A.sort is not a function`: The `ArrayBuffer` polyfill includes `TypedArray.prototype.sort`, but we don't deliver `ArrayBuffer` to browsers that have `TypedArray` but don't have `TypedArray.prototype.sort` (e.g. [Chrome 44](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/TypedArray/sort#browser_compatibility))

* `[TypedArray].prototype.sort: argument is not a Function object`: We should not pass `undefined` to `sort`

All of these have been fixed except A.sort is not a function, which may require some discussion. I think we have a few options:

1. Deliver the `ArrayBuffer` polyfill to versions that do not have `TypedArray.prototype.sort`

2. Write a separate `TypedArray.prototype.sort` polyfill

3. Implement `TypedArray.prototype.sort` inside `TypedArray.prototype.toSorted`

Thanks for the detailed write-up! I'm in favour of option 2. It has precedent as we took that option for Promise.prototype.finally as well -- https://github.com/Financial-Times/polyfill-library/blob/master/polyfills/Promise/prototype/finally/config.toml#L9

[mhassan1]

I've added TypedArray.prototype.sort. This is ready for re-test.

[romainmenke]

/ok-to-test sha=bde70e8

[mhassan1]

I've addressed a couple more failures:

• Use Object.getPrototypeOf instead of __proto__ for IE10 and below
• Use new instead of Construct in Safari 10 and below, which has typeof Int8Array === 'object'

This is ready for re-test.

[romainmenke]

/ok-to-test sha=22b3791

[JakeChampion]

Tests running at https://github.com/Financial-Times/polyfill-library/actions/runs/4872382344

[romainmenke]

CI all green 🎉