You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm getting extremely gritty and pedantic with trademarks here, but, on the ForkAwesome web site, the icon dropdown, the Facebook logo is used to generalize brand icons:
The concept of brand icons is not owned by Facebook or vice versa, so this is not a legal use of Facebook's logo; Facebook does not represent the entire concept of brands (as much as they might like to). Usually I would ignore something like this, but it's a bit ironic since the brand icons section does have correct instructions on trademarks, which the very same site violates («Please do not use brand logos for any purpose except to represent that particular brand or service.»).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think using the forkAwesome logo would be a better choice as while a branding is likely trademarked, it wouldn't be a good example of the category. That or use the branding for an Open Source project the team supports (with permission).
I'm getting extremely gritty and pedantic with trademarks here, but, on the ForkAwesome web site, the icon dropdown, the Facebook logo is used to generalize brand icons:
The concept of brand icons is not owned by Facebook or vice versa, so this is not a legal use of Facebook's logo; Facebook does not represent the entire concept of brands (as much as they might like to). Usually I would ignore something like this, but it's a bit ironic since the brand icons section does have correct instructions on trademarks, which the very same site violates («Please do not use brand logos for any purpose except to represent that particular brand or service.»).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: