Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Resolves #1156: Improve infrastructure for FDBRecordStorePerformanceTest #1157

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

MMcM
Copy link
Contributor

@MMcM MMcM commented Feb 27, 2021

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

@ohadzeliger ohadzeliger left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks like a really useful framework to use. My questions are really about the "meta" usage rather than the particulars of the PR:

  • Are there plans to calculate a baseline- are there environment/hardware specs that remain relatively constant such that we can compare baseline benchmarks to new results?
  • It would be really useful to have IDE integration to these (website says they are "hard").
  • Eventually some CI integration would be necessary - What are the considerations we need to take into account?

@MMcM MMcM changed the title Jmh Resolves #1156: Improve infrastructure for FDBRecordStorePerformanceTest Mar 6, 2021
…PerformanceTest

Create a JMH subproject with the outline of some benchmarks.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants