Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Corrupted Display of Switch Positions #2171

Closed
Hartinger opened this issue Dec 7, 2022 · 11 comments
Closed

Corrupted Display of Switch Positions #2171

Hartinger opened this issue Dec 7, 2022 · 11 comments
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Milestone

Comments

@Hartinger
Copy link

With my Horus X10S Express and ETHOS 1.4.4 I observed some strange behaviour in the logical switch menu, w.r.t. the indication of switch positions.

Here is a simple LS, which is FALSE (NB the top left corner of the first screenshot).
screenshot-2022-12-07-43333
screenshot-2022-12-07-43356

The same switch when TRUE.
screenshot-2022-12-07-43346
screenshot-2022-12-07-43425

@Wolepo
Copy link

Wolepo commented Dec 7, 2022

A further error from a converted file from X20 to X10S Express:
LS

@Hartinger
Copy link
Author

In my case the file had not been converted, it was rather generated on the X10S Express.

@Wolepo
Copy link

Wolepo commented Dec 7, 2022

In my own models, the displays in the overview (x10S Express) are clean. If you open an LS, the number is followed by a -. In the overview, the ~ is displayed as ≥.
Übersicht
This refers to the function A ~X, value (X) = 100, but only occurs in a few cases.

@mawzthefinn
Copy link
Collaborator

I'm seeing the same behaviour, X20 converted file on X12S-ISRM

@kenumis
Copy link

kenumis commented Dec 7, 2022

Probably the same problem with displaying symbols and characters on my X10. Happened after updating to 1.4.4
(red world in pictures are in the correct format)

A
B
C

@bsongis-frsky
Copy link
Collaborator

I think it is the font!

@bsongis-frsky
Copy link
Collaborator

bsongis-frsky commented Dec 8, 2022

Would you mind trying those fonts, they are for 1.4.5 and perhaps they will fix your issue
fonts.zip

@bsongis-frsky bsongis-frsky added the information needed Further information is requested label Dec 8, 2022
@bsongis-frsky bsongis-frsky self-assigned this Dec 8, 2022
@STC148
Copy link

STC148 commented Dec 8, 2022

with the fonts the problem seems to be solved

@bsongis-frsky
Copy link
Collaborator

Ok then I need to update the uploads from 1.4.4

@bsongis-frsky bsongis-frsky added bug Something isn't working and removed information needed Further information is requested labels Dec 8, 2022
@bsongis-frsky bsongis-frsky added this to the 1.4.5 milestone Dec 8, 2022
@Hartinger
Copy link
Author

I can confirm that the problem is fixed with the new fonts.

@bsongis-frsky bsongis-frsky modified the milestones: 1.4.5, 1.4.4 Dec 9, 2022
@bsongis-frsky
Copy link
Collaborator

I have added the fonts to the 1.4.4 release, you may update with Suite now

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants